US Representative Elect Wesley Bell explains that there were bad people and good people on both sides in Ferguson

mark francis

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2021
Messages
26,973
Far too often the majority of public media portray a biased, slanted, and edited view of reality. Wesley Bell gets it right.


Three months after police officer Darren Wilson killed 18-year-old Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, in 2014, setting off what became the Black Lives Matter movement, Wesley Bell — the current St. Louis prosecutor running to unseat Rep. Cori Bush — told a local news radio show that there wasn’t a strong racial divide in Ferguson.

Bell, who was serving as a municipal court judge and community college professor at the time, said he hoped Brown’s killing would “wake some people up” to get Black residents more engaged in their community and that the real “tragedy” of the situation was that the prosecutors hadn’t shared Wilson’s side of the story with the public, which was fomenting distrust in the process.

In Bell’s opinion, not releasing evidence that spoke to “the officer’s side of the story” was a mistake on the part of the prosecution. “To me that’s the tragedy of it — is that months later, I can’t even tell you whether I believe the officer should be indicted or not, because I don’t have the evidence,” Bell said.
 
Werbung:
Far too often the majority of public media portray a biased, slanted, and edited view of reality. Wesley Bell gets it right.


Three months after police officer Darren Wilson killed 18-year-old Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, in 2014, setting off what became the Black Lives Matter movement, Wesley Bell — the current St. Louis prosecutor running to unseat Rep. Cori Bush — told a local news radio show that there wasn’t a strong racial divide in Ferguson.

Bell, who was serving as a municipal court judge and community college professor at the time, said he hoped Brown’s killing would “wake some people up” to get Black residents more engaged in their community and that the real “tragedy” of the situation was that the prosecutors hadn’t shared Wilson’s side of the story with the public, which was fomenting distrust in the process.

In Bell’s opinion, not releasing evidence that spoke to “the officer’s side of the story” was a mistake on the part of the prosecution. “To me that’s the tragedy of it — is that months later, I can’t even tell you whether I believe the officer should be indicted or not, because I don’t have the evidence,” Bell said.
You clearly didn't read the whole article.
 
So you claim. Did you read about Representative Bell's criticism of the prosecutors who tried to convict an innocent cop of some crime in the case?
Yes. That's what courts and prosecutors do. Let the justice system work.

You're happy in this instance but insist Trump is innocent without it getting to court. Crooked judges and corrupt prosecutors??
Grow up.
 
Werbung:
Crooked judges and corrupt prosecutors??
There were many biased left-leaning judges 10uyears ago but since then the percentage of left-leaning judges has skyrocketed.


Criminal Justice, Politics & Government

Politicized courts and the partisan leanings of U.S. judges and attorneys: Data analysis of the 50 states​

2015 study from Stanford University and the Harvard Kennedy School comparing the ideological positions of judges across different tiers of the judiciary between judges and lawyers.
 
Back
Top