So you disagree with Roe v Wade. The courts set viability as a benchmark for when abortion is, and isn't, acceptable.
You hope... but when they are not on the same page you defer all rights to the woman and the man has no say in whether or not his child should live.
I'm not being judgemental. If there is judgement taking place, its coming from those of you who think the child and the father have no rights during a pregnancy. You have judged them both to be irrelevent to the womans "right" to choose.
I didn't ask about octo-mom. I asked about the father of an unborn child who is given no right to "choice" as to whether or not his child will be aborted. The same rightless father who is held responsible for the welfare of the child if its born.
That is incorrect. My premises and conclusions are logically sound and fully supported by scientific fact. If they were not, then you could cite scientific facts to debunk them, but you cannot.
This is simply equivocation. My opinion is backed by logic and science, yours appears to be backed by emotion and popular sentiment.
When you say that... you are placing yourself in the extreme minority opinion and in opposition to the findings of the court in Roe v Wade.
Red Herring. I've never tried to argue that my opinion would matter during a delivery. My opinion is on when the life of an individual begins.
Perhaps you should take it down a notch with the shouting and try not to be so emotional.
