Reply to thread

Either you can substantiate your claims or you cannot...it appears you cannot.

Let's just be very clear.  There is a clear mechanism in place to "remove" the President from office. At no time has this mechanism been undertaken in any way.  Those are facts.  Pointing to political fights where the opposition party disagreed with the sitting President (how surprising) and claiming that is akin to an effort to "remove" him from office is simply absurd on its face.   

Again - please highlight when Republicans used the formal mechanisms in place to remove a sitting President.  In the absence of that, your claim that they attempted to "remove" him from office is simply false.

Probably why you would be unable to point to me saying such a thing here.

Elections are about more than name ID.  Let's face it.  Romney spent in the ballpark of exactly the same amount of money as Obama.  Did people not know who Romney was?  You have asserted in a previous post that an election was "bought" as if it was an unfair election in some manner.  If you (or anyone) has proof of this, let's hear it.  If not, then you are simply making an unsubstantiated claim with no basis in fact. 

I don't need your physical proof.  But surely you can produce something to add some validity to your own statement.

I agree - which is why I think you have presented a rather poor argument.