Gipper
Well-Known Member
BO often speaks of TRANSFORMING America. Of course, this means turning us into a socialist sh*thole with a progressive elite in charge and completing ignoring the Constitution.
He also likes to consider himself similar to Lincoln, which is an absurdity because Lincoln would never do what BO is doing. Here is a good article on this subject.
He also likes to consider himself similar to Lincoln, which is an absurdity because Lincoln would never do what BO is doing. Here is a good article on this subject.
Lincoln sought the preservation of America, not its transformation. Rather than envisioning a new future, he appealed to the old moral, political, and social truths of liberty and equality. These were true not by dint of his personality, but because they are universal and reasonable. Lincoln was the servant of enduring constitutional principles so that he could end slavery and preserve the Union.
America today needs not “transformational leadership,” but constitutional statesmanship.
Compared to the idea of “transformational leadership,” the idea of constitutional statesmanship now seems out of place, like shouting “Give me liberty or give me death!” in a movie theater. Yet given the choice of further attempts at the unconstitutional transformation of the country, or seeking to be a statesman much better attuned to the Constitution, the president in his second year in office might better heed the example of his hero Lincoln.
For Lincoln, the Constitution was inviolable. He knew that the presidential oath he took to “preserve, protect and defend” the Constitution defined his responsibility. More than any other promise a president makes it matters most.
http://biggovernment.com/dbobb/2010...l-leadership-or-constitutional-statesmanship/