Their worst nightmare for our enemies

Werbung:
Fighter aircraft costing bazillions is not actually all that big a deal in the present times of drones.
There have been no fighter aircraft dogfights in any recent wars. I think the last were in the Korean War.

Our country pays millions to train fighter pilots, it pays billions for new aircraft that use millions of dollars in fuel, and when one crashes (due to plot error or equipment failure nearly all the time) then the government has to support the dead pilot's family for a very long time.

A one shot drone can shot down anything that the Russians, Chinese, Iranians or North Koreans have for a teensy percentage of the total cost of super expensive fighter aircraft. What we need to concentrate on is making cheaper and more accurate drones.
 
Fighter aircraft costing bazillions is not actually all that big a deal in the present times of drones.
There have been no fighter aircraft dogfights in any recent wars. I think the last were in the Korean War.

Our country pays millions to train fighter pilots, it pays billions for new aircraft that use millions of dollars in fuel, and when one crashes (due to plot error or equipment failure nearly all the time) then the government has to support the dead pilot's family for a very long time.

A one shot drone can shot down anything that the Russians, Chinese, Iranians or North Koreans have for a teensy percentage of the total cost of super expensive fighter aircraft. What we need to concentrate on is making cheaper and more accurate drones.
Yoir aure rthere have been no dog dights in recent wars there gabe ?And do you not comprehend they carry missles not just air to air but air to ground and air to sea and are more stealthy
 
Yoir aure rthere have been no dog dights in recent wars there gabe ?And do you not comprehend they carry missles not just air to air but air to ground and air to sea and are more stealthy
What I comprehend is that fighter aircraft have not been useful anywhere in recent times.
The US has fought in Vietnam, Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan and many local skirmishes and has not won a single war in any conclusive manner. Fighter aircraft are obsolete or obsolescent compared to drones, and HUGELY expensive.

Missiles delivered by drones can also be made stealthy.

Tell us where the US and any enemy aircraft have fought recently. You cannot, because there have been none.

The most productive thing about building these obsolete things is that they are built by American companies and the workers are paid well. They consume epic amounts of fuel, and that makes Big Oil happy.
 
What I comprehend is that fighter aircraft have not been useful anywhere in recent times.
The US has fought in Vietnam, Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan and many local skirmishes and has not won a single war in any conclusive manner. Fighter aircraft are obsolete or obsolescent compared to drones, and HUGELY expensive.

Missiles delivered by drones can also be made stealthy.

Tell us where the US and any enemy aircraft have fought recently. You cannot, because there have been none.

The most productive thing about building these obsolete things is that they are built by American companies and the workers are paid well. They consume epic amounts of fuel, and that makes Big Oil happy.
fighter air craft are not out of date they severe a mulita function role like the f22s f35s and f16 in Iran where they clobbered the missile and radar systems in IRAN Syria and Lebanon . O yes I forgot you also claim that aircraft carriers are out of date yet nations keep building them ou don't know the difference between the capability's of a f22 raptor and think drones are better .
Your really clueless . All I can say is I am extremely happy that you have nothing to do with the military or common sense decisions .

just like Biden just did and it resulted in Russia using ICBMs on the Ukraine raising the chances of a nuclear war
 
Bullshit! The fact that people are still doing stupid things like pissing away billions on obsolete weapons like aircraft carriers and
 
your seriously dumber then a hoe handle air craft carriers give us the power to raach out and touch you any where on the earth. YOUR cluess
Aircraft carriers were most useful when there were no satellites and the enemy did not know where your carriers and other ships were and how many of them there were. Now satellites have made surprise naval attacks impossible. And of course, there are undersea drones as well. The US has most of the world's carriers. They are useful these days for shelling locations on land. Large naval battles as there were in WWII have not happened since 1945.
 
Aircraft carriers were most useful when there were no satellites and the enemy did not know where your carriers and other ships were and how many of them there were. Now satellites have made surprise naval attacks impossible. And of course, there are undersea drones as well. The US has most of the world's carriers. They are useful these days for shelling locations on land. Large naval battles as there were in WWII have not happened since 1945.
MY my your ignorance is profound a carrier strike group has the ability to strike 1000 miles away from its location . And if yor so right why is it IRAN and the Yemen scum have yet to sink ANY Military ship and these same vessels can attack ten at will as you can not see a f35 or f22 raptor And lug nut we have carriers deployed in war zones right now and the last dog fight was 1999 with a mig 29 and a f16 . Most natiins are not stupid enough to challange us in such things due to the fact we have air superior fighters and systems
.
1999
 
Werbung:
someone has been watching top gun I and II too many times...

iran has enough rocketry to destroy the entire state of israel sans occupied territories - power, pumping stations
dimona.. the lot


comrade stalin
gaza famine is still the issue
 
Back
Top