The Worst News Yet for Republicans

Greco

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2008
Messages
634
I never thought I'd actually say this, but I'm beginning to feel just a trace of sympathy for Republicans.

Bad news seems to be sweeping over the wingnuts like a tsunami. Only a few days ago the new ABC/Washington Post showed only 20% of Americans now say they are Republicans, the lowest number since they started taking the poll in 1983. It's hard to be much of a national factor when 80% of Americans claim their affiliation to anything but your party. Now there is a new scientific study just released that not only is really bad news for the wingnuts, it's stuningly embarrassing.

It seems the men in the Republican Party have clinically been proven to be woosies. It would be very challenging to recurit new members if the stigma of being a woosie came with your new membership. I guess the wingnut girly men may have to change the meaning of their nickname, G.O.P. (Grand Old Party) to G.O.P. (Group of Pansies).

Study: McCain Voters Lost Testosterone
By BUCK WOLF, Senior Correspondent,
AOL News, October 21, 2009

(Oct. 21) -- Young men who voted for John McCain lost more than a presidential election last November. A study says their testosterone level plummeted.

As polls closed on election night, researchers at Duke University and the University of Michigan had 183 men and women chew gum and spit into test tubes and analyzed their hormones. A few hours later, as Barack Obama supporters began celebrating, they tested hormone levels again, and then later, at two more intervals. Men who voted for Obama maintained stable testosterone levels, while men who voted for McCain saw those levels drop more than 25%.

"What this study shows us is how stress and outside stimulus influences our physiology," said Duke University spokesman Karl Leif Bates. Bates said the hormone study falls in line with other research on how interpersonal contests boost or reduce testosterone. "We've tested men playing video games, and we've found the same temporary drop or rise in testosterone," Bates said. "We're soon going to repeat this test at a Duke-UNC game."

Testosterone –- a hormone a man manufactures in his testes – has been linked to stress, aggression and risk-taking. Women manufacture testosterone, too, in their ovaries and adrenal glands. A woman's testosterone levels are lower, and that makes them less likely to experience rapid testosterone changes. In the study, testosterone levels for Democratic and Republican women remained stable.

Source: http://news.aol.com/article/study-finds-mccain-voters-lost/729783

Oh, by the way, I'm now over my temporary feeling of sympathy for the wingnuts.
 
Werbung:
And the more liberal (i.e. big-spending, big-govt) the Republican party gets, the more that trend will continue.
Yeah.....that's Republicans' problem.....

:rolleyes:


Pro-Rape Senators

Alexander (R-TN)
Barrasso (R-WY)
Bond (R-MO)
Brownback (R-KS)
Bunning (R-KY)
Burr (R-NC)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Corker (R-TN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeMint (R-SC)
Ensign (R-NV)
Enzi (R-WY)
Graham (R-SC)
Gregg (R-NH)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Isakson (R-GA)
Johanns (R-NE)
Kyl (R-AZ)
McCain (R-AZ)
McConnell (R-KY)
Risch (R-ID)
Roberts (R-KS)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Thune (R-SD)
Vitter (R-LA)
Wicker (R-MS)​
 
Clipped from GRECO's article:
As polls closed on election night, researchers at Duke University and the University of Michigan had 183 men and women chew gum and spit into test tubes and analyzed their hormones. A few hours later, as Barack Obama supporters began celebrating, they tested hormone levels again, and then later, at two more intervals. Men who voted for Obama maintained stable testosterone levels, while men who voted for McCain saw those levels drop more than 25%.

OMG...so that explains WHY the millions of Republicans didn't go to the voting booths...they didn't have enough testosterone to even get them there...:eek:

That truly was the election that proved who had the 'BALLS' to show up and vote and who DID NOT :D Do you think that they'll start having mandatory hormone injections at their RNC rallies :confused:
 
its good some think like you, it just makes the party even smaller....
....And, it's gettin' more-obvious, as-we-speak......​

"Not long ago, as attention centered on the Senate Finance Committee's moderate health-care reform bill, pundits dismissed the idea of a publicly run insurance program to compete with private insurers as all but dead. Now, as Senate leaders are close to merging that bill with a more liberal alternative passed earlier in the summer, the public option—a sort of Medicare for the masses—appears to be making a comeback.

Support for the concept generally runs strong among Democrats in Congress and with the public as well, some polls suggest. A Washington Post/ABC poll published on Oct. 20 found that support for a public option has increased since the summer, with 57% of all Americans now favoring a public insurance option and 40% opposing it."
 
Yeah.....that's Republicans' problem.....​


:rolleyes:



Alexander (R-TN)
Barrasso (R-WY)
Bond (R-MO)
Brownback (R-KS)
Bunning (R-KY)
Burr (R-NC)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Corker (R-TN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeMint (R-SC)
Ensign (R-NV)
Enzi (R-WY)
Graham (R-SC)
Gregg (R-NH)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Isakson (R-GA)
Johanns (R-NE)
Kyl (R-AZ)
McCain (R-AZ)
McConnell (R-KY)
Risch (R-ID)
Roberts (R-KS)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Thune (R-SD)
Vitter (R-LA)

Wicker (R-MS)​


It was a horrible thing that happened to this young woman. I'm confused by her, and her lawyer's, comment about serving this country. She was a contractor, not in the military? I'm also confused by the civil claim, why is there no discussion of criminal charges?

With that said, the hiring of mercenaries to defend and work side by side with the military must stop. Again and again, this has been a challenge and it needs to be fixed. Primarily these groups fill the gaps that our current military structure doesn't account for. We need to revamp our entire military structure to better handle and manage 21st century warfare.

On the Frankin bill, it is poorly written and doesn't do a very good job protecting anyone. This isn't about allowing civil suits against large contractors. Do you really think that would have prevented this woman from being raped? The bill is a poorly thought out reaction and needs to have a broader scope while focusing on the criminal prosecution of all participants, including those involved in cover-ups and tampering with evidence.

Shame on the Republicans who voted against it, but then didn't offer a better alternative.
 
It was a horrible thing that happened to this young woman. I'm confused by her, and her lawyer's, comment about serving this country. She was a contractor, not in the military?

With that said, the hiring of mercenaries to defend and work side by side with the military must stop. Again and again, this has been a challenge and it needs to be fixed. Primarily these groups fill the gaps that our current military structure doesn't account for.
.....For PROFIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!​
"The CBO looked at the cost of hiring private guards versus the cost of providing similar security with US military units. Among the factors analysts took into consideration was that the Pentagon must pay and outfit multiple brigades to keep one in Iraq, due to deployment rotations.

The result was a tie, according to the CBO.

"The cost of having an Army contingent provide the same services as Blackwater appears to be roughly the same as the cost of the contract itself," Orszag said.

The same holds true for more mundane logistical operations, says the CBO. Hiring a private oil-truck driver for Iraq costs about as much as recruiting, training, and providing a uniformed equivalent."

On the Frankin bill, it is poorly written and doesn't do a very good job protecting anyone. This isn't about allowing civil suits against large contractors. Do you really think that would have prevented this woman from being raped? The bill is a poorly thought out reaction and needs to have a broader scope while focusing on the criminal prosecution of all participants, including those involved in cover-ups and tampering with evidence.
Let's see it.

Where did you find it?​
 
That's what I figured.....ya' got nothin'!!!!!

:rolleyes:

Sec. 8104. (a) None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be used for any existing or new Federal contract if the contractor or a subcontractor at any tier requires that an employee or independent contractor, as a condition of employment, sign a contract that mandates that the employee or independent contractor performing work under the contract or subcontract resolve through arbitration any claim under title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 or any tort related to or arising out of sexual assault or harassment, including assault and battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, false imprisonment, or negligent hiring, supervision, or retention.
 
Werbung:
banner.gif

"We all agree on two things. First, the Republican party is the best party in the world. Our party is the party of record low taxes and near record high deficits. Our party is the party of free market solutions for the things that we like and paternalism for the things that we don't like. Our party espouses Christian values. Our party makes war. Our party will always stand against socialist programs and government healthcare; except for Social Security, Medicare, Tricare, Medicaid, and others that are too popular to publicly oppose. Our party is undeniably incredible.

Second, being a "victim" of rape is, at best, a minor inconvenience and can be acceptably swept under the rug. Binding arbitration can and does deliver sufficient remedies for "victims" of gang rapes so breathtaking that the victim requires reconstructive surgery. I can't provide any examples of restitution because the proceedings of such cases are kept secret."


*

 
Back
Top