there is a great deal that says its not even close to 6000 years , and the same proof use for that, is often the same that's used to proof documents and things are from the time of Jesus...yet later the same people often seem to throw them out as not accurate.
No I am not a believer, I find nothing in the story of the bible that is believable. honestly to me the story seems , just about as unlikely as that of Scientology ( of course not quite that bad, man that is just a dumb idea they have...I try to respect other Religions...but not that one lol) But my point about the laws and Court house is, this nation is build on laws, and those laws should be held by everyone, and not based on Religion as this is a nation where you are free to be christian, I am free to not believe in any god, and others are free to believe in other gods. To have outside a proclamation of support of one Religion destroys the idea of neutrality of the courts in any case that may have some other Religion in it. Think about the Debate for VP, while in the end no one could say it was bias...everyone on the right here went in thinking it was bias...because of her book. Anyone walking in that church who is not Christian would think that the court was bias, and we don't want our court system to be that do we?
The econ is better now then under clinton? Tell that to anyone I know, anyone on the street, any cust I talk to, any one I work with, ...NO one thinks its better. I don't know where you see it, maybe in the lines of the very riches pocket books, but everyone I know is hurting. If you wish to keep thinking its better, then fine, but just like McCain who kept saying the same thing, when you lose the election, don't think you have to look hard for why. I don't know when having to bail out the banks at maybe a trillion bucks was a good econ, but you can have it. I don't recall doing that in the 90s.
As for republicans in 90's you know what I recall them doing, one think. talking about Bill Clinton's penis and what it was doing. I don't recall them doing anything about cutting spending at all, or fighting terrorism ( only attacking Clinton when he attacked afghanistan targeting Bin Laden)Fact iw Bill was the man at the top, **** was good. Bush is the man at the top , **** is bad. Under Republicans before Clinton, things where not good again..( hence why he lost to clinton) even though I liked Bush I.
Bush in the state of the Union gave named to things of evidence,....Both where not correct. Iraq already had yellowcake, I know, and we knew. it was actually part of the reason we knew the story and the document he talked about to be fake. It was a known fake, I knew it was a fake, I knew that our intel people said it was fake, I knew that the signature was said to be clearly forged and child like. Bush stood up and use it anyway. Now if you knew that , and you watched Obama get up and use that document for a war, what would you think about it? The you saw him talk about something else, as proof that you also knew to not be true ...even if you had other intel you had seen from years before...would you not start to question , that if this is the best he has to tell us and its not true, and he should know its not? that maybe there is something up here? I had read those reports before, I believed Iraq had WMD ( it was one thing I was really glad I was wrong about going into Iraq. I was up all night fearing that they would use them against us or Israel....I should add some **** at fox stated they hoped they used them ...to prove liberals wrong...) But I started to more and more doubt bush the more he talked...In the end I found more and more intel that showed he he most likely did not have any, some suggestion he did but got rid of it in 1998 when out inspectors left...our source for that was killed by Saddam after we got this intel.
