Irishone21
Well-Known Member
There is cogent evidence, which supports invasion of Pakistan, particularly the region of Waziristan, to which Ayman al-Zawahiri as well as the infamous Osama Bin Laden, whom many Americans believe is being used as a means to exploit and control the Middle East, are believed to be hiding. Osama (not nearly as big of a threat to national security as Obama) is widely assumed to have passed away sometime in the past. However, considering the hatred Americans have towards this titular head, his name continues to live on as a means to beguile the pliant, technologically dependent, masses of America.
It is true, from a realist perspective, that if we choose to omit the emerging threat of Al-Queda officials who, according to the National Intelligence Estimate, have “regenerated key elements,” then we may be puting ourselves in a vulnerable state. Some may protrude this news as the makings of a Doomsday scenario, in which the Democrats will receive the blame for stalling decisive action. We very well may find ourselves in regret if we refrain from offensive action; after all, the common philosophy of political advisers in our government is that of a good offence, bringing to mind the famous phrase, “the best defense is a good offense”. This phrase also goes along with the theory and principle of war, which states, “if victory can be won, advance; if victory can not be won, assume a defensive posture”. These common lessons, whether true or false, are the subjective ideologies floating around Washington, repressing liberalism, and challenging the pride, or “hubris” as Greek historians would call it, of all thinkers surrounding this seemingly irremediable situation.
Many believe we have reached a “point of no return” which was caused because of a family vendetta, fear of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, without forgetting our avid desire for Middle Eastern oil. All of these fears, insecurities, and questionable actions turned our country into a bellicose, imperialistic, arrogant superpower. We are seemingly approaching our anticipated downfall, which no human prophesier could have foretold prior to 9/11, with the exception of the brilliant thinkers of antiquity, and conspiracy thinkers that no one believes, nor respects enough to take into consideration. But it is true, the core of the capitalist world economy is mutable, and remaining the biggest superpower forever is a mere impossibility, noting the struggles of bringing global order, plus the dangers of remaining in a war based on folly, ineffective leadership, and ambiguity.
Judging from all the illicit behavior in American politics, which has attached another stigma to the reputation of our country, even I, have lost a great deal of faith in the heroism of our nation. This stigma is a product of war mongrels and military advocates such as Rumsfeld and Cheany. Of offensive strategist such as Michael Gerson, to perjurers like Gonzalez, to elusive, would be perjurers, and political maneuverers like Karl Rove, down to the hypocrisy of republican homosexuals including the recent solicitor of gay sex, Craig, in addition to Folley, Haggard and others. Giving these unfortunate stains on the dignity of our nation, I can understand the aversion to American leadership. I also forgot to mention the prominence of fraud, which is being investigated by the Pentagon, the department which gave a nebulous response when asked about the whereabouts of over 19 billion dollars, which has been supposedly giving to Iraq, for improvements in Iraqi security. They claim they simply can’t account for this enormous sum of money, all while the media spends little time focusing on this conspiracy.
Anything negative that pertains to our government is either censored, or hidden inside a newspaper full of unreadable information. The governments or corporals don’t want to bring our culpable Government any more trouble, as negative media that exposes government corruption runs the risk of Americans hearing depravity and rather then remaining content, oblivious, and apathetic as they usually do, strife may appear, strife in which our government in not prepared for.
In regards to the invasion in Pakistan, I think that considering our current standpoint, it would be a fatal mistake, especially if done so without the consent of the Pakistanis. Perez Musharrat may have lost hold of his nation, and his career may be coming to a close, but if we step in, there could be repercussions that we may not be able to handle. Without first clarifying our intentions, or spending time diffusing a more positive, more liberal and peaceful message for Middle East to hearken, we will enter a country that may damage us more crucially then expected. We need to deliver a message that opposes the whole war, one in which forgives Al-Queda and retires the abused word, “terrorism”.
If war is in fact inevitable, we, nonetheless, must try and exhaust all peaceful methods of resolution prior to engaging another country in state of war. We need to promulgate America as a nation that is not cynical, chauvinistic and arrogant, but as a nation that is altruistic, merciful, and progressive towards global prosperity, not poverty. A new wave of thought, that is optimistic of the outcome of providing for countries in need, rather than viewing patronage, and such altruistic endeavors as suggested as the “fastest road to national disaster.” Being a globalist has more to do with finding ways of turning competition into cooperation, which applies mainly to enhancing the worldwide economic situation that consist of only third world countries, some richer then others... globalist are more active in low policis, but in regards to high politics, such as security, attempts like “collective security” fail, for the diversity of the world creats a dicordant involvement, and when it comes down to it, self help is usually the only dependable aspect to security. A liberal mentality is more likely to reconcile this problem than conservitism.
We can’t let the burning of American flags, nor the invective speeches of foreign speakers offend us, nor inflict us with the disease of hate. Optimism, Love, and deference to one true God is what we should emphasize in our diplomacy efforts, for emphasis on these three things are the only possible ways that we can help prevent potential catastrophes.
Wake up! Don’t be molded into the same regressive state that a one-sided, often shallow media or other form of propaganda puts many in. Don’t be swindled by others… Don’t fall a victim to the brainwash that creates a illusive portrayal of our “national identity,” the same national identity infuriating and instigating the same enemies that we wish to appease. What we need is a contagious, decisive, liberal form of politics pervading our government, not regressive realist politics. Only a liberal mind can restore value to our government. Only a liberal mind can appropriately defend the civil liberties of all. Only a liberal mind can change our offensive power politics. We need to be considering all levels of analysis, and factoring in the effect of ones economic situation on their disposition. Instead of setting a goal of abolishing terrorism, we need to set the goal of changing humans.
The liberal Revolution will prevail, as the ideas that bring harmony to all.
It is true, from a realist perspective, that if we choose to omit the emerging threat of Al-Queda officials who, according to the National Intelligence Estimate, have “regenerated key elements,” then we may be puting ourselves in a vulnerable state. Some may protrude this news as the makings of a Doomsday scenario, in which the Democrats will receive the blame for stalling decisive action. We very well may find ourselves in regret if we refrain from offensive action; after all, the common philosophy of political advisers in our government is that of a good offence, bringing to mind the famous phrase, “the best defense is a good offense”. This phrase also goes along with the theory and principle of war, which states, “if victory can be won, advance; if victory can not be won, assume a defensive posture”. These common lessons, whether true or false, are the subjective ideologies floating around Washington, repressing liberalism, and challenging the pride, or “hubris” as Greek historians would call it, of all thinkers surrounding this seemingly irremediable situation.
Many believe we have reached a “point of no return” which was caused because of a family vendetta, fear of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, without forgetting our avid desire for Middle Eastern oil. All of these fears, insecurities, and questionable actions turned our country into a bellicose, imperialistic, arrogant superpower. We are seemingly approaching our anticipated downfall, which no human prophesier could have foretold prior to 9/11, with the exception of the brilliant thinkers of antiquity, and conspiracy thinkers that no one believes, nor respects enough to take into consideration. But it is true, the core of the capitalist world economy is mutable, and remaining the biggest superpower forever is a mere impossibility, noting the struggles of bringing global order, plus the dangers of remaining in a war based on folly, ineffective leadership, and ambiguity.
Judging from all the illicit behavior in American politics, which has attached another stigma to the reputation of our country, even I, have lost a great deal of faith in the heroism of our nation. This stigma is a product of war mongrels and military advocates such as Rumsfeld and Cheany. Of offensive strategist such as Michael Gerson, to perjurers like Gonzalez, to elusive, would be perjurers, and political maneuverers like Karl Rove, down to the hypocrisy of republican homosexuals including the recent solicitor of gay sex, Craig, in addition to Folley, Haggard and others. Giving these unfortunate stains on the dignity of our nation, I can understand the aversion to American leadership. I also forgot to mention the prominence of fraud, which is being investigated by the Pentagon, the department which gave a nebulous response when asked about the whereabouts of over 19 billion dollars, which has been supposedly giving to Iraq, for improvements in Iraqi security. They claim they simply can’t account for this enormous sum of money, all while the media spends little time focusing on this conspiracy.
Anything negative that pertains to our government is either censored, or hidden inside a newspaper full of unreadable information. The governments or corporals don’t want to bring our culpable Government any more trouble, as negative media that exposes government corruption runs the risk of Americans hearing depravity and rather then remaining content, oblivious, and apathetic as they usually do, strife may appear, strife in which our government in not prepared for.
In regards to the invasion in Pakistan, I think that considering our current standpoint, it would be a fatal mistake, especially if done so without the consent of the Pakistanis. Perez Musharrat may have lost hold of his nation, and his career may be coming to a close, but if we step in, there could be repercussions that we may not be able to handle. Without first clarifying our intentions, or spending time diffusing a more positive, more liberal and peaceful message for Middle East to hearken, we will enter a country that may damage us more crucially then expected. We need to deliver a message that opposes the whole war, one in which forgives Al-Queda and retires the abused word, “terrorism”.
If war is in fact inevitable, we, nonetheless, must try and exhaust all peaceful methods of resolution prior to engaging another country in state of war. We need to promulgate America as a nation that is not cynical, chauvinistic and arrogant, but as a nation that is altruistic, merciful, and progressive towards global prosperity, not poverty. A new wave of thought, that is optimistic of the outcome of providing for countries in need, rather than viewing patronage, and such altruistic endeavors as suggested as the “fastest road to national disaster.” Being a globalist has more to do with finding ways of turning competition into cooperation, which applies mainly to enhancing the worldwide economic situation that consist of only third world countries, some richer then others... globalist are more active in low policis, but in regards to high politics, such as security, attempts like “collective security” fail, for the diversity of the world creats a dicordant involvement, and when it comes down to it, self help is usually the only dependable aspect to security. A liberal mentality is more likely to reconcile this problem than conservitism.
We can’t let the burning of American flags, nor the invective speeches of foreign speakers offend us, nor inflict us with the disease of hate. Optimism, Love, and deference to one true God is what we should emphasize in our diplomacy efforts, for emphasis on these three things are the only possible ways that we can help prevent potential catastrophes.
Wake up! Don’t be molded into the same regressive state that a one-sided, often shallow media or other form of propaganda puts many in. Don’t be swindled by others… Don’t fall a victim to the brainwash that creates a illusive portrayal of our “national identity,” the same national identity infuriating and instigating the same enemies that we wish to appease. What we need is a contagious, decisive, liberal form of politics pervading our government, not regressive realist politics. Only a liberal mind can restore value to our government. Only a liberal mind can appropriately defend the civil liberties of all. Only a liberal mind can change our offensive power politics. We need to be considering all levels of analysis, and factoring in the effect of ones economic situation on their disposition. Instead of setting a goal of abolishing terrorism, we need to set the goal of changing humans.
The liberal Revolution will prevail, as the ideas that bring harmony to all.
