The queen of idiots blames Harris for loss

[the annoying thing]

Like it or not Biden's miraculous win was not legitimate and was statistically impossible.

View attachment 17938

View attachment 17939

View attachment 17940

View attachment 17941


View attachment 17942

View attachment 17943

View attachment 17944

yep they should of threw in 10 or 20 thousand for trump to at least make it look good lol , but again they are not to smart.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

yep they should of threw in 10 or 20 thousand for trump to at least make it look good lol , but again they are not to smart.

You, on the other hand, are still awaiting to learn the difference between to, too and two. You are the Prince of Duh.

 

[the annoying thing]

You, on the other hand, are still awaiting to learn the difference between to, too and two. You are the Prince of Duh.

O my the wonder boy speaks

 

[mark francis]

Another claim out of thin air. Clinton got 3 million votes more than Trump. Biden even more. You and your ilk believe in elections only when your candidate wins. Unamerican and fascist.

How many of Hillary's votes votes do you think were proven to have been legitimately cast? I assure you that not very many were examined for accuracy and legitimacy because that would have taken months and nobody spent that much time proving the votes were legitimate.

 

[mark francis]

Another term that I am confident you have no idea of its meaning.

Here: you flip a coin 600000 times. You seem to think it is “statistically impossible” that you would get 600000 heads. That claim is just bs and out of thin air from a person who is severely undereducated.

Democrats claim statistics prove nothing but that is because democrats are mathematically and morally challenged.

Study Shows Impossible Anomalies Causing Biden ‘win’ in Michigan -- In 5 Seconds Biden Racked Up 140,000 | The Gateway Pundit | by Benjamin Wetmore 12-11-20



Study Shows Impossible Anomalies Causing Biden ‘win’ in Michigan — In 5 Seconds Biden Racked Up 140,000

A recently published review of available election data shows: major voting machine manipulation in favor of Biden. In almost every Michigan precinct, Biden had exact 50-55% higher absentee totals than Trump. In 5 seconds, Biden’s total votes in Michigan went up 140,000 votes. In 9 problem Michigan Counties, the absentee votes between Trump and Biden are so similar that the study’s author says they are clear indications of vote machine manipulation.

“Statistically impossible.”

“The odds here, of all of this, are like winning the Powerball 65 times in a row.”

 

[Randomguy]

Democrats claim statistics prove nothing but that is because democrats are mathematically and morally challenged.

Study Shows Impossible Anomalies Causing Biden ‘win’ in Michigan -- In 5 Seconds Biden Racked Up 140,000 | The Gateway Pundit | by Benjamin Wetmore 12-11-20



Study Shows Impossible Anomalies Causing Biden ‘win’ in Michigan — In 5 Seconds Biden Racked Up 140,000

A recently published review of available election data shows: major voting machine manipulation in favor of Biden. In almost every Michigan precinct, Biden had exact 50-55% higher absentee totals than Trump. In 5 seconds, Biden’s total votes in Michigan went up 140,000 votes. In 9 problem Michigan Counties, the absentee votes between Trump and Biden are so similar that the study’s author says they are clear indications of vote machine manipulation.

“Statistically impossible.”

“The odds here, of all of this, are like winning the Powerball 65 times in a row.”

And how is that “impossible?” And is “impossible” different from “statistically impossible?”

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

If Democrats do not understand mathematics, then accusing them of altering the results is absurd.

 

[mark francis]

And how is that “impossible?” And is “impossible” different from “statistically impossible?”

I have files full of clear evidence showing the statistically impossibility of the reported Biden win that resulted from after hours dumps of Biden votes into democrat election wards.

 

[Randomguy]

I have files full of clear evidence showing the statistically impossibility of the reported Biden win that resulted from after hours dumps of Biden votes into democrat election wards.

When cornered you just ignore the point and repeat your nonsense.

 

[mark francis]

When cornered you just ignore the point and repeat your nonsense.

What do you know about the science of statistics? Are you claiming the science is bogus?

Here is irrefutable congressional testimony about the 2020 election:

- EXAMINING IRREGULARITIES IN THE 2020 ELECTION (govinfo.gov) 12-16-20

[Senate Hearing 116-405]

[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

EXAMINING IRREGULARITIES IN THE

2020 ELECTION


This year, thousands upon thousands of Nevada voters had

their voices canceled out by election fraud and invalid

ballots. Here is how it happened.

On August 3, 2020, after a rushed special session, Nevada

legislators made drastic changes to the State's election law by

adopting a bill known as Assembly Bill No. 4 (AB 4). The

vulnerabilities of this statute were obvious: It provided for

universal mail voting without sufficient safeguards to

authenticate voters or ensure the fundamental requirement that

only one ballot was sent to each legally qualified voter. This

was aggravated by election officials' failure to clean known

deficiencies in their voter rolls. Because of AB 4, the number

of mail ballots rocketed from about 70,000 in 2016 to over

690,000 this year.

The election was inevitably riddled with fraud, and our

hotline never stopped ringing. While the media and Democrats

accused us of making it all up, our team began chasing down

every lead. Our evidence came both from data scientists and

from brave whistleblowers.

Here is what we found. Over 42,000 people voted more than

once. Our experts were able to make this determination by

reviewing the list of actual voters and comparing it to other

voters with the same name, address, and date of birth. This

method was also able to catch people using different variations

of their first name, such as William and Bill, and individuals

who were registered both under a married name and a maiden

name.

At least 1,500 dead people are recorded as voting, as shown

by comparing the list of mail voters with the Social Security

death records.

More than 19,000 people voted even though they did not live

in Nevada. This does not include military voters or students.

These voters were identified by comparing the lists of voters

with the U.S. Postal Service's (USPS) National Change of

Address database, among other sources.

About 8,000 people voted from nonexistent addresses. Here

we cross-referenced voters with the Coding Accuracy Support

System which allowed our experts to identify undeliverable

addresses.

Over 15,000 votes were cast from commercial or vacant

addresses. Our experts found these voters by analyzing official

U.S. Postal Service records that flag nonresidential addresses

and addresses vacant for more than 90 days.

Incredibly, almost 4,000 noncitizens also voted, as

determined by comparing official Department of Motor Vehicles

(DMV) records of noncitizens to the list of actual voters in

the 2020 election.

The list goes on. All in all, our experts identified

130,000 unique instances of voter fraud in Nevada. But the

actual number is almost certainly higher. Our data scientists

made these calculations not by estimations or statistical

sampling, but by analyzing and comparing the list of actual

voters with other lists, most of which are publicly available.

To put it simply, they explained their methods so others could

check their work. Our evidence has never been refuted, only

ignored.

Two Clark County technical employees came forward,

completely independent of each other, and explained that they

discovered that the number of votes recorded by voting machines

and stored on Universal Serial Bus (USB) drives would change

between the time the polls were closed at night and when they

were reopened the next morning. In other words, votes were

literally appearing and disappearing in the dead of night. When

we attempted to verify the integrity of these voting machines,

we were allowed only a useless visual inspection of the outside

of a USB drive. We were denied a forensic examination.

Finally, our investigation also uncovered a campaign to

illegally incentivize votes from marginalized populations, by

requiring people to prove they voted to receive raffle tickets

for gift cards, televisions, and more.

Our determined team verified these irregularities without

any of the tools of law enforcement, such as grand jury

subpoenas or the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents.

Instead, we had less than a month to use critical thinking and

elbow grease to compile our evidence. We tried to obtain

testimony or documents from Clark County officials, but they

obstructed and stonewalled. When we filed suit, State officials

and even courts delayed proceedings for days, but then offered

us merely hours to brief and argue our cases.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

Every single person who is eligible to vote has his/her own reason for how he votes and even IF he votes.
Biden was a very well known experienced White male politician.
Kamala was a less well known female Black politician. I suppose that there are dozens of reasons and emotional states that caused people to vote how they did. Race, gender, experience and familiarity are the main differences, but emotion also plays a role.
Anyone who voted for Trump because they thought that he would make egg and gasoline cheaper is simply stupid, but here are really people that stupid.

I think that race and gender were the most important factors why people stayed home or voted for whomever, but certainly not the only reasons.

 

[Randomguy]

What do you know about the science of statistics? Are you claiming the science is bogus?

I know I asked you a simple question and you did not answer. So it seems you are the bogus part here. You are good at copy paste stuff that you have zero understanding of.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

Statistics is not an easy field to master. And for a person who thinks faith is more important than reason, statistics are useless.
Again, what is faith? It is belief not based on evidence.

 

[mark francis]

Every single person who is eligible to vote has his/her own reason for how he votes and even IF he votes.
Biden was a very well known experienced White male politician.
Kamala was a less well known female Black politician. I suppose that there are dozens of reasons and emotional states that caused people to vote how they did. Race, gender, experience and familiarity are the main differences, but emotion also plays a role.
Anyone who voted for Trump because they thought that he would make egg and gasoline cheaper is simply stupid, but here are really people that stupid.

I think that race and gender were the most important factors why people stayed home or voted for whomever, but certainly not the only reasons.

Trump supports traditional American views, values, rights and liberties while democrats are more interested in fundamentally transforming America to be more like atheistic socialist communist nations.

 

[mark francis]

I know I asked you a simple question and you did not answer. So it seems you are the bogus part here. You are good at copy paste stuff that you have zero understanding of.

Statistical anomalies in the 2020 Presidential Election | Kiwiblog 11-21-20

9 = Anomaly of hugely lopsided Biden votes added in minutes in the dead of night. This statistical anomaly was picked up in real time by an analyst awake in Switzerland at around 3am Central Standard Time (CST) of the morning of November 4th watching the results coming in for Wisconsin. He noticed Fox News' election map of Wisconsin went from light red for Trump with a 77% likelihood for Trump to light blue for Biden with an 80% for Biden IN THE SPACE OF MERE MINUTES. He got suspicious of such a massive switch in such a short period of time and so he went to the New York Times minute by minute electronic update from the raw data feed supplied by Edmonds Polling of reported election results and observed this:

“For non-programmers, here is the translation:

At 3:37 AM CST, total votes were 3,018,212; Trump had 1,536,270 votes (50.9%); Biden 1,427,614 votes (47.3%); other candidates 54,328 votes (1.8%).

At 3:42 AM CST, total votes were 3,186,598; Trump had 1,561,433 votes (49.0%); Biden 1,570,993 votes (49.3%); other candidates 54,172 votes (1.7%).

Total increase in Trump votes in 5 minutes: 25,163 (1.64%).

Total increase in Biden votes in 5 minutes: 143,379 (10.04%).

Before the Biden vote dump, both candidates' votes were increasing at about the same rate, 1.64% per 5 minutes. So, the “legitimate” Biden vote increase is likely around 23,400 votes. The remaining 119,979 votes are fake.