The IG reports that the FBI had informants dressed as Trump supporters storming the Capitol on Jan 6, a charge lying Wray denies

Werbung:
mark francis said:
The deep state continues its campaign of corruption and lies to hide democrat crimes and corruption from the American people.

  • FBI informants stormed Capitol on Jan. 6, but probe says bureau didn’t authorize it
Click to expand...
From your own link:

The investigation found no evidence that undercover FBI employees were part of the protests.

You are so dishonest.
 
Randomguy said:
From your own link:

The investigation found no evidence that undercover FBI employees were part of the protests.

You are so dishonest.
Click to expand...

www.foxnews.com

DOJ IG reveals 26 FBI informants were present on Jan. 6

DOJ Inspector General said there were more than two dozen confidential human sources in the crowd outside the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, but only three were assigned by the FBI to be present for the event, Fox News has learned.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com

Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz said there were more than two dozen confidential human sources (CHSs) in the crowd outside the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, but only three were assigned by the FBI to be present for the event, while stressing that none of the sources was authorized or directed by the bureau to "break the law" or "encourage others to commit illegal acts," Fox News has learned.

Horowitz on Thursday released his highly anticipated report on the FBI’s Handling of its Confidential Human Sources and Intelligence Collection Efforts in the Lead Up to the Jan. 6, 2021 Electoral Certification.

DOJ INSPECTOR GENERAL DOES NOT DENY FBI INFORMANTS WERE AMONG JAN 6 CROWD
 
mark francis said:
Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz said …
Click to expand...
From your own link:

The investigation found no evidence that undercover FBI employees were part of the protests.

You are so dishonest.

If you will not address my point, please do not respond to me.
 
Randomguy said:
From your own link:

The investigation found no evidence that undercover FBI employees were part of the protests.

You are so dishonest.

If you will not address my point, please do not respond to me.
Click to expand...
That is not the only report and those are not the only details. Deep state officials tend to hide inconvenient facts using deceptive phrases or slightly dishonest arguments, like Bill Clinton's infamous "That depends on what your definition of 'is' is" remark. Here is another view of the facts that leftists have not yet attempted to refute:

 
Randomguy said:
From your own link:

The investigation found no evidence that undercover FBI employees were part of the protests.

You are so dishonest.
Click to expand...
The writer obviously was trying not to openly and clearly contradict the report's findings but may have engaged in a sneaky ruse to deceive the public into disbelieving the report by some carefully worded claim, like "The report does not find any evidence that IRS sources entered a particular door to the basement like some said." Who cares about that? The FBI plants infiltrated the Jan 6 crowd and were seen, identified, and never charged for the violence they incited and/or committed to stir up the crowd.
 
Randomguy said:
From your own link:

The investigation found no evidence that undercover FBI employees were part of the protests.

You are so dishonest.
Click to expand...
They were not "part" of the process? What is the writer trying to say? The FBI operatives were inside the building. The planted operatives incited and committed violence. Some dressed as Trump supporters. None were charged. Is the writer trying to say the evidence does not show them taking part in some remor=te part or aspect of the demonstration while being present and participating in other aspects?
 
mark francis said:
The writer obviously was trying not to openly and clearly contradict the report's findings but may have engaged in a sneaky ruse to deceive the public into disbelieving the report by some carefully worded claim, like "The report does not find any evidence that IRS sources entered a particular door to the basement like some said." Who cares about that? The FBI plants infiltrated the Jan 6 crowd and were seen, identified, and never charged for the violence they incited and/or committed to stir up the crowd.
Click to expand...
Not so. Your own link says there was no evidence to that effect. You made yourself into a pretzel trying to deny your own link.
 
Randomguy said:
Not so. Your own link says there was no evidence to that effect. You made yourself into a pretzel trying to deny your own link.
Click to expand...
The report does not say the FBI assets did go into the Capitol and yet did not go into the Capitol. Somebody is trying to deceive you.
 
Werbung:
your faith in the ability of frump to keep his hands of the loot is touching but ultimately completely misplaced

comrade stalin
osage
 

Similar threads

M
    • Like
Democrat judge rules enhanced Democrat charges for alleged Jan 6 offences are unjust
2
Replies
25
Views
596
mark francis
M
M
Forget Watergate. That was child's play compared to Obama's use of Comey and the FBI to secretly spy on Trump beginning in 2015
2
Replies
25
Views
263
pjmret
P
M
After supporting the lying Russian asset against Trump, the Biden DOJ wants to throw the book at the FBI asset who broke the Biben bribery scam
Replies
4
Views
225
mark francis
M
M
    • Like
The anti-Trump criminal officials at the top of the FBI are now running scared since Trump won the election.
Replies
0
Views
54
mark francis
M
M
    • Like
Congress to charge Biden family members with lying and election interference
Replies
14
Views
131
Boris Norris
B
Back
Top