That's an ignorant statement. People who say such things know nothing about which they speak. When you boil down the entire 'credit crunch' to the very basics, it's people borrowing money they could not afford to borrow. It doesn't matter if you make $100K a year, if you borrow too much money, you'll end up bankrupt.
If the US spent the entire budget on health care, that would not stop one single person from taking out a loan they can't afford to repay. Therefore, it would not stop any of the so-called "credit crunch".
Further, if the US spent the entire budget on health care, there would be hundreds of thousands of people unemployed from the military, there would still be people living off of welfare, there would still be businesses closing. It would change none of that, therefore it wouldn't end unemployment.
Tell me, is there any topic you do know something about? Even one?
In the UK, the waiting list to get "looked after" is 1 million people long... with 40K of which have been on the list for over a year. That doesn't seem like their getting looked after. Moreover, everyone here that goes to a hospital does get treated. I don't know anyone who is sick, but isn't getting looked after here, it just costs a lot of money.
When they are a threat to our security, yes we will.
When I look around the world at all the atheist that claim to do what you say, more people die under your kind of "help".
Cubans are willing to die to swim them and their families away from an atheist that claims to help the poor.
Under your control, people would die. That's all there is too it. Yes you can claim to want to help the poor, but you'd kill them. Just like Canada, like Cuba, like Venezuela and all the other socialists that came before you.
