Reply to thread

It also removes the seat of power from the US as the Office of President and Commander in Chief then rests within an international court and opens the door for any foreigner or foreign man willing to obey and enforce US law to lay claim to the Office thus striking down the requirement of “Natural born [ American ] citizen” to then become elected to this office.  This court cannot now deny the truth of the Rennslear County NY court and the states as well as all named parties most especially Linda Griffin:


Petitioner is hated only for woman, genius and Susan Herbert exactly, or,


Being a natural born American citizen who used the law as a weapon in her defense as she acted to enforce it when no state would. She used the law as no man could or would thus she is hated for being of the ability to embody the law wholly, or to become what no other citizen was willing to become: An actual President and Commander. Susan Herbert was born without the human ability to fear the unethical and so she has been violated, tortured even, for not possessing the human ability to become unethical thus become one of the criminals and for refusing to believe she is a powerless victim.


I do not know how to stress this firmly enough: This NY action proves beyond any doubt all offices have been unchecked and remain so or else it never would have escalated to this degree. I never would have become a first, for better or worse. 



 


Susan Herbert, petitioner and counsel,

In Re Susan Herbert 08-6622,

The acting, legal President and Commander in Chief.



And the letter to the 'judge':

We all know that I sent those letters to the Austin’s AFTER I bought the plane ticket and AFTER the US Supreme Court scheduled me for hearing as it did so a few days later but BEFORE my case was denied any remedy and relief. I sent those letters on Tuesday or Wednesday, as I’ll have to check the federal postal receipt, the Tuesday or Wednesday BEFORE that following Monday, the day the order was issued. It was not premeditated or planned as I do not control US Supreme Court and as I informed this court and the local police at the same time. Is your genius plan to use words to make it seem as if again? I’d guess YES. Does this mean you do have a deal with the 3rd District Appellate? Because we can always call in Clayton Higgins, William Suter, Jeff Atkins or Roberts – to testify before the NY Appeals Court thus proving you are a crook. We can actually ask the entire appellate bench as I named Judith S. Kaye. YOU CAN’T HEAR A CASE IN NY IF THE CHIEF JUDGE OF NY STATE’S HIGHEST BENCH IS NAMED, DUH.  You do not get to cry you did not know. I told the US Supreme Court: It is not possibly corrupted and criminal anymore it is corrupted and criminal as twice is no mistake.


Now, as no person could know what the US Supreme Court would decide and as I would be breaking the law and abusing my kids if I knowingly sent them back to batterers and abusers and I told you they had been injured, you be my guest: Rule as we all know you decided to before I ever entered your court and thus become the family court judge who enters the history books for blaming and labeling a mother a criminal and abusive, not ‘worthy’ of custody her own person or her children for OBEYING & ENFORCING THE LAW. 


As for moral authority? If I was not it, if I did not have more than you, I would not be In Re Susan, as moral authority is will it is not mores or being forced to obey as in America no person can be forced to do anything. The only answer to that question is “I feel that way” as if you do not feel what you say is a fact then it is not so. Like you, saying and pretending you are a judge but then acting like a child abuser, wife beater and king, as you feel as if you are above the law. You say you are not but your feeling betrays you as if you did not feel it then you would not do it. I know you tried not to show it; I saw your face. I had to stop myself from saying something to you.


I cannot wait to tell the world when before US Supreme Court or human rights court that Leslie Ortiz advised you to consider an unfair burden was being placed upon the kidnappers by the mother, the mother who was the victim of the kidnapping. 


Your arrogance is astounding and appalling.


I warned you once to never decide you can know what a Trojan horse may be harboring. You reasoned you could ignore the law as appearances deceived you as you assumed the Supreme Court was not going to act. There is no such thing as In Re Susan II. Did I not state that I was after a unanimous decision? I received one – 0-9 - thus Marbury was violated and so I was awarded exactly what I needed as that then gave me standing to sue the Court directly. By naming my case In Re Susan when I did not name it that? It is the Court turning the clock back; it is resetting the time to April of 2008 and so nothing you have done is legal and is then a felony. What, you believe the Court wants to violate Marbury??? They had no choice but to reset the clock – travel back in time – and so act as if I am being heard for the first time. I set a trap and you ran into it. I gave you details, details and more details and you ran into it. How eager can any one person be to break the law and injure the innocent? Is it that much fun or are you that worried? I told the Court: Guilty people act guilty; you should wonder how many victims did not know what was being done to them.


You do not get to reason and decide how clever I am as that has already been decided by God. A lot of things have. Why don’t you spend your time figuring out what I could have possibly told the Court in order to be re-docketed like no other case ever, as it had to be something good. Violating Marbury was enough, but something caused the Court to do what it has never done before…what could that be? I told you: Twice is no mistake – my red hair is not coincidence. The Supreme Court doesn’t think so either.


I wish I could have seen the Court’s face when they discovered that you ruled what they deemed to be an extraordinary change of circumstances was not. But wait – you were the judge who said she did not believe that I had a ‘revelation’ while living with the Sioux in Bismarck and Mandan where Lewis & Clark wintered and met Sacajawea, weren’t you? The judge who ruled a rehab was not good enough if it was far from home, say, in FL, West Palm exactly, in 2000? I had to pick, Betty Ford or FL and I picked FL as I know: FL is not accident, as I was conceived there, in St. Augustine, the oldest city and the place the fountain of youth is located or so they say. As ideas are the cause of things, I placed the symbol for infinity over a map using the two points I know – St. Augustine where I was conceived and Troy, where I was born and the cross hairs, as this symbol resembles an “8”, landed exactly on Roanoke: My cause as the people landing there had an idea: Virginia Dare aka liberty. I fully expected that, as X actually does mark the spot.


You may call me crazy when you access the Supreme Court or the divine which ever comes first. I will not be holding my breath while I wait, as neither is likely to happen for you in this life as first, you gotta believe!


I cannot know the details only the outcome: Whether in our highest court or an international court I will win the day. I already have a bill of attainder argument written up, I already gave the Court an option other than granting me oral argument and I already have my case for International Court outlined. If I had little or no moral authority? You wouldn’t need to act so guilty, would you? It is as Kelly said: If you’re honest, honest then shows. YES as it is a pattern. Twice I have done what no other litigant has done. All you’ve done? More of the same: what is criminal.


BTW – you should know me well enough to then know when or if Susan chooses to go to the FBI again or to go public she can and will as once she sets her mind to something it is then realized as she acts upon it and does not stop until she gets what she needs not what you want which would be justice. I need it and you do not want me to have it. The universe does not change for you as you’re not special nor are you God. There are plenty of ways to guarantee I receive justice and you serve life in or out of an actual prison. Public humiliation is one of them. Don’t personally like it?


Sue me.


P.S. I was never on trial – you were. Your plea? GUILTY!


P.P.S. You admitted: her injury is “forever” as you exactly quoted that; she is “forever a pro se litigant…a class”. Why, is that you admitting my injury will never, ever end due to something you are doing? As I do not know any other person deemed to be “FOREVER pro se”. Forever? That’s a stretch; you have to be a 1st degree murderer to be labeled forever anything in a court of law! That is: The death penalty.  So, either that class of one is the murderer or that judge is. As I’m not guilty you must be as me? If I were guilty of anything the cops or the US Marshal would have arrested me or one of those abuse reports against me would have stuck – if they were not falsified, that is. I’d be in jail or criminal court not US Supreme, lol.


P.P.P.S. Happy election day!!!


Back
Top