Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
Re: Early people and boatsThis is what the fossil record actually says about Australopithecus:It may have been an ancestor to early species of the genus homo, and may, therefore, be a part of the family tree of homo sapiens. It also may not be.Nowhere is the claim made that the genus homo evolved independently in China, Australia, and Africa, from Australopithecus or any other creature.What the fossil record indicates is that the genus homo evolved in Africa, that the species homo sapien was a restless creature that eventually managed to inhabit six of the seven continents, through sea voyages, land bridges, and migrations. It is not at all surprising that homo sapien made the trip to Australia and America, or the islands of the Pacific.You can refute "Darwinistas" if and only if you continue to make up nonsense and attribute it to evolutionary theory.
Re: Early people and boats
This is what the fossil record actually says about Australopithecus:
It may have been an ancestor to early species of the genus homo, and may, therefore, be a part of the family tree of homo sapiens.
It also may not be.
Nowhere is the claim made that the genus homo evolved independently in China, Australia, and Africa, from Australopithecus or any other creature.
What the fossil record indicates is that the genus homo evolved in Africa, that the species homo sapien was a restless creature that eventually managed to inhabit six of the seven continents, through sea voyages, land bridges, and migrations. It is not at all surprising that homo sapien made the trip to Australia and America, or the islands of the Pacific.
You can refute "Darwinistas" if and only if you continue to make up nonsense and attribute it to evolutionary theory.
