Susan Rice: No regrets about Benghazi remarks

[steveox]

U.S. National Security Advisor Susan Rice said on Sunday she has no regrets about initially characterizing the Sept. 11, 2012, attack in Benghazi, Libya, as a "spontaneous response" to an anti-Islam video.

“What I said to you that morning, and what I did every day since, was to share the best information that we had at the time,” Rice told NBC's David Gregory in her first appearance on "Meet the Press" since making her initial remarks about the attack on the show. “The information I provided, which I explained to you, was what we had at the moment. It could change. I commented that this was based on what we knew on that morning, was provided to me and my colleagues and indeed to Congress by the intelligence community, and that’s been well validated in many different ways since."

Rice and other administration officials later came under fire after the attack was determined to be an act of terror.

"That information turned out in some respects not to be 100 percent correct," Rice continued. "But the notion that somehow I or anybody else in the administration is patently false, and that’s been amply demonstrated.”

https://news.yahoo.com/rice-benghazi-meet-the-press-214525483.html

Discuss

 

[GBFan]

No surprise here ... to regret would indicate a fallibility the left doesn't believe possible.

 

[steveox]

The left denies everything. They deny the IRS scandal, they even deny Fast & Furious scandal

 

[pocketfullofshells]

you mean facts, that republicans hate. Flat earth society

 

[GBFan]

you mean facts, that republicans hate. Flat earth society

Wow!!! A really outstanding response ... concise, fact filled, and ever so convincing.

Perchance, could you elaborate just a little? Maybe you can tell us, for example, why the administration chose to intentionally mislead the American public in the run-up to the election? Maybe you can tell us why the administration has refused to allow witnesses to testify?

 

[steveox]

Wow!!! A really outstanding response ... concise, fact filled, and ever so convincing.

Perchance, could you elaborate just a little? Maybe you can tell us, for example, why the administration chose to intentionally mislead the American public in the run-up to the election? Maybe you can tell us why the administration has refused to allow witnesses to testify?

Every one of them avoids the questions asked by the senate panel. Just like Eric Holder avoids the questions Fast and the Fast & Furious, Louis Learner avoids the questions I.R.S targeting scandal And Hillary avoids the questions on Benghazi. Bill OReilly was right last night when he compared this to Nixons Watergate. When Nixon corrupted Watergate the Media was in full blitz and Democrats rush to impeach him. But when Obama commits these scandals the Media looks the other way and Democrats say so what? The Media is ignoring Benghazi meanwhile theyre still hammering Christie on Bridge Gate.

 

[Cruella]

Rice....another convenient tool for Obama and Co.

She fell on the sword and will be paid handsomely.

 

[steveox]

 

[GBFan]

'Tis true.