Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
The original Federal District Court in Arkansas decision relied heavily on the logic that the 2nd Amendment allowed people to have guns so we can have a well maintained militia. It did not talk about personal safety, etc. This Supreme Court ruling reversed the decision of the Federal District Court in Arkansas, essentially saying, "that's not the proper interpretation". The justices did not add new opinions of their own. In fact, subsequent courts have struggled with what United_States_v._Miller really means.
The original Federal District Court in Arkansas decision relied heavily on the logic that the 2nd Amendment allowed people to have guns so we can have a well maintained militia. It did not talk about personal safety, etc.
This Supreme Court ruling reversed the decision of the Federal District Court in Arkansas, essentially saying, "that's not the proper interpretation". The justices did not add new opinions of their own. In fact, subsequent courts have struggled with what United_States_v._Miller really means.
