You are so phony. When the same courts rule to your dislikes, you call them savages.
Darwin called African and Austrailian blacks savages so what is wrong with calling savages savages?
All of them or some of them? Then or also now?
I think ignorant racist Darwin thought all blacks were lesser evolved humans still possessing their unevolved animal characteristics.
Darwin would submit to falsifiability. You and your god and your religion do not.
Do you even understand what you are trying but failing to prove? You are saying Darwin's speculations must be right because scientists can prove his theories false, but God must not exist because scientists cannot prove anything about God.
You simply do not understand falsifiability. I said no such thing. In fact quite the contrary. Darwin’s theory is science based a therefore can be falsified. But the crap you want us believe to be true is not and therefore is not scientific.
What does the fact that God cannot be falsified mean to you? That God does not exist? That nothing the Bible says will ever prove to support true science? That Christianity is stupid and secular science is wise?
I have answered this multiple times. Always the same answer. Here: There is no evidence that god does not exist. There is also no evidence that god does exist.
I am not sure. I suppose some stuff in the Bible does support “the science.” What yiu said does not parse well.
Not really. As you have already agreed: “Nobody can prove God exists …”
If nobody can prove or disprove God exists, what else does the secular definition of "falsibility" provide you that is significant between secular views and Christian views of God or science?
There is only one definition of falsifiability that I know of. Once you claimed we disagree on definition of falsifiability but would not reveal your definition. You simply dont know what it means.
Falsififiability pertains to natural science and has nothing to do with God or spiritual matters.
That is not a definition. Tell us in your own word.
Thank god???
