Reply to thread

dUring a debate On Australian TV with a Catholic Cardinal, Dawkins admitted he could be called an agnostic because he can not prove that God exists. Yet he lead a crusade against those who promote a belief in God like the Cardinal. If you can not prove that God does not exist why are you so worry about it. He attack Catholic and conservative icons, like Mother Teressa, a belief  in the Real presence, saying a wafer becoming God, and even in those Catholics  saying the Birth controls do not work. These  are not the majority of Catholic beliefs. He is setting up straw men to knock down rather than debate the important questions like Why are we here? To Dawkins this is an unimportant question. TO Catholics it is the important question I will try and answer question on what Catholic believe in another thread.