read
Obama wants to tax financial outfits supposedly to recoup the TARP money. Only problem is that many of these companies did not get TARP money, and many others have paid it back.
So what exactly is he doing this for ?
I mean besides taking the money and having the customers pay for it. You know, all those customers making less that $200k that he said woudl not see a tax increase.
Sounds like a bill of attainder to me. If it gets passed I guess we'll find out.
I wonder if Fannie / Freddie get to pony up too ? Somehow I'm guessing not.
Obama wants to tax financial outfits supposedly to recoup the TARP money. Only problem is that many of these companies did not get TARP money, and many others have paid it back.
So what exactly is he doing this for ?
I mean besides taking the money and having the customers pay for it. You know, all those customers making less that $200k that he said woudl not see a tax increase.
Sounds like a bill of attainder to me. If it gets passed I guess we'll find out.
President Barack Obama told banks Thursday they should pay a new tax to recoup the cost of bailing out foundering firms at the height of the financial crisis. "We want our money back," he said.
In a brief appearance with advisers at the White House, Obama branded the latest round of bank bonuses as "obscene." But he said his goal was to prevent such excesses in the future, not to punish banks for past behavior.
The tax, which would require congressional approval, would last at least 10 years and generate about $90 billion over the decade, according to administration estimates. "If these companies are in good enough shape to afford massive bonuses, they are surely in good enough shape to afford paying back every penny to taxpayers," Obama said.
Advisers believe the administration can make an argument that banks should tap their bonus pools for the fee instead of passing the cost on to consumers.
The president's tone was emphatic and populist, capitalizing on public antipathy toward Wall Street. With the sharp words, he also tried to deflect some of the growing skepticism aimed at his own economic policies as unemployment stubbornly hovers around 10 percent.
The proposed 0.15 percent tax on the liabilities of large financial institutions would apply only to those companies with assets of more than $50 billion — a group estimated at about 50. Administration officials estimate that 60 percent of the revenue would come from the 10 biggest ones.
They would have to pay up even though many did not accept any taxpayer assistance and most that did have repaid the infusions.
Obama said big banks had acted irresponsibility, taken reckless risk for short-term profits and plunged into a crisis of their own making. He cast the struggle ahead as one between the finance industry and average people.
"We are already hearing a hue and cry from Wall Street, suggesting that this proposed fee is not only unwelcome but unfair, that by some twisted logic, it is more appropriate for the American people to bear the cost of the bailout rather than the industry that benefited from it, even though these executives are out there giving themselves huge bonuses," Obama said.
He renewed his call for a regulatory overhaul of the industry and scolded bankers for opposing the tighter oversight in legislation moving through Congress.
"What I'd say to these executives is this: Instead of setting a phalanx of lobbyists to fight this proposal or employing an army of lawyers and accountants to help evade the fee, I'd suggest you might want to consider simply meeting your responsibility," Obama said.
I wonder if Fannie / Freddie get to pony up too ? Somehow I'm guessing not.