You're entitled to your opinion. I assure you, I'm comfortably secure in my educational attainment.
Which goes without saying - ask a stupid question, you get a stupid answer.
I did define the words I'm using.
If you are not satisfied with how I defined them, then you are free to google search them all you want.
All philosophical schools of thought start from a basic premise, correct?
Science is merely a branch of materialist philosophy that operates within the basic premise that material phenomena have ONLY material causes.
Clear?
So my statement is merely an assertion of the scientific method, no?
What bs am I peddling here?
That everything must have a cause?
That an infinite regress of the causes of material phenomena is impossible?
That at some point, everything must have come from something. And that something is a NECESSARY BEING, as opposed to a CONTINGENT BEING?
This logical process is what democritus used to theorize the atom, fyi. And quantum mechanics proves him right, beyond a doubt.
A working knowledge, you say???
We are in the realm of THEORETICAL PHYSICS and you require a working knowledge of it??!!
Unbelieveable!!!
The thing is - it's quite difficult to write equations in this medium. So I make do with the english language to explain something mathematical.
You are free to google what I say and see the equations for yourself, though. That way, you could respond to what I say and not be reduced to attacking my credentials or intentions.
