Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
???And yet you simultaneously demand that government to get into it. Do you really think the institution of marriage that has evolved throughout history, did so out of concern that two people are stimulating each others genitals to the point of orgasm, and nothing to do with the fact that when a man and a woman rub theirs together, a baby might pop out 9 months later? And that therefore it should apply equally to gays? Nonsense. The marriage laws were written when there was no way to genetically verify who are the biological parents or any way to verify the fertility of a couple. Silly to think that because we now have the ability to screen out infertile couples, that we must. Why should the law presume that if a lesbian bears a child, that her partner is the biological parent? Or if a gay man comes up with a baby biologically related to himself, why would we presume his gay lover is also the biological parent? WE DONT!! because in both cases there is the REAL biological parent to consider. Im just waiting for cases to occur in Mass., when a Lesbian, cheats on her wife and gets pregnant, and the laws going to presume that the woman cheated on, is the biological parent. Could make for some messy divorces. She could demand more of the marital property OR joint cutody of a kid that she has no biological connection to whatsoever. Imagine your situation Segap. If instead of a difficult ex wife who is biologically related to the child that you have to contend with in the raising of your child, it was instead your ex husband, totally unrelated to the child biologically, but with the same rights your current ex wife exercises.
???And yet you simultaneously demand that government to get into it.
Do you really think the institution of marriage that has evolved throughout history, did so out of concern that two people are stimulating each others genitals to the point of orgasm, and nothing to do with the fact that when a man and a woman rub theirs together, a baby might pop out 9 months later? And that therefore it should apply equally to gays? Nonsense. The marriage laws were written when there was no way to genetically verify who are the biological parents or any way to verify the fertility of a couple. Silly to think that because we now have the ability to screen out infertile couples, that we must.
Why should the law presume that if a lesbian bears a child, that her partner is the biological parent? Or if a gay man comes up with a baby biologically related to himself, why would we presume his gay lover is also the biological parent? WE DONT!! because in both cases there is the REAL biological parent to consider. Im just waiting for cases to occur in Mass., when a Lesbian, cheats on her wife and gets pregnant, and the laws going to presume that the woman cheated on, is the biological parent. Could make for some messy divorces. She could demand more of the marital property OR joint cutody of a kid that she has no biological connection to whatsoever. Imagine your situation Segap. If instead of a difficult ex wife who is biologically related to the child that you have to contend with in the raising of your child, it was instead your ex husband, totally unrelated to the child biologically, but with the same rights your current ex wife exercises.
