After that last post, I changed my mind. I can't let a leap of logic like that go unchallenged.
*sigh*. You can't get it through your head, can you? You keep saying that procreation is the defining characteristic of a licensed, government institution called marriage. And again, I must ask you, what about sterile couples? Do they deserve to obtain marriage licenses, and if so, why? There is absolutely no possible way for them to procreate. Next, you say that sperm and eggs alone are enough. What if the woman has had her ovaries removed and has no eggs? Should she be denied a marriage license? Answer me.
Why can't you discuss thing like a mature adult without throwing in the idiotic, juvenile commentary? No one takes you seriously at all when you do that.
This is the thing I couldn't let pass. I am going to put this stupid "toy cap gun" theory of yours to rest once and for all.
Explain to me how a marriage between a man and a woman is harmful or lethal in any way. Yet they are regulated and licensed by the government. Are you telling me that if my 60 year old neighbors next door, both a man and a woman past their childbearing age, decide to get married that they could potentially harm or kill someone? Is that why the government has been regulating marriage all these years? Think about it. There is no relevance at all between real guns, toy guns, and marriage.
Then why haven't they outlawed divorce?
Show me ANY evidence that children who are raised by homosexual couples do worse than children who are not and you'll have an argument. Otherwise you're just pissing in the wind.
