Reply to thread

First, yeah, but Democrats control both the Senate and House currently, and they controlled the Senate in 2001-2003.  Plus, having a one or two vote majority isn't really having complete control.   When the size of your lead in only 1 vote, it's not like you can pass whatever you need without the other side.   However, I do see what you mean.  Remember, not all republicans and in fact Republicans.  Jumping Jim Jeffords?   "RINO"


Second, there is a large difference between, seeing the need to pass something yet realizing that your political opponents are simply not going to allow it, and having a lack of conviction or adherence to conservative principals.  When you know that you will be thwarted, sometimes it's better to pick a battle you can win, than fight something you know you can't.


Third... with the above said...  I don't buy it.  I think they should have tried it anyway, and forced a vote on it.  That way they can say they tried and were stopped.  Just like Welfare reform.  They passed it 3 or 4 times, and Billy vetoed it each time.  It built my faith in them at the time.


Back
Top