Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum

Reply to thread

Message

Thanks for the explanation in post 18. It explains a lot about the situation and the inevitability of the OBama nomination.
However, you explanatory post 18 was not showing on my machine at the time I made the latter post, now post 19 (which is "The question is will the change be 'real change' and for the better of all or will it be the 'same ol same ol' masquerading as change which will only support the political and financial status quo."), about questioning how much real political change is actually in the future irregardless of who wins and irregardless of the current promises made by the candidates on either side. From what I've been hearing all the candidates are promising some kind of 'change'. However, DC being the way it is, seems to be very comfortable in maintaining the current status quo when it comes to doing the business of politics and could be very resistant to any so called 'new bipartisan ideas'.
I was just wondering out loud and not knocking OBama in particular; just all the Presidental candidates in general.

<blockquote data-quote="icono1" data-source="post: 37368" data-attributes="member: 370">Thanks for the explanation in post 18. It explains a lot about the situation and the inevitability of the OBama nomination. However, you explanatory post 18 was not showing on my machine at the time I made the latter post, now post 19 (which is &quot;The question is will the change be &#039;real change&#039; and for the better of all or will it be the &#039;same ol same ol&#039; masquerading as change which will only support the political and financial status quo.&quot;), about questioning how much real political change is actually in the future irregardless of who wins and irregardless of the current promises made by the candidates on either side. From what I&#039;ve been hearing all the candidates are promising some kind of &#039;change&#039;. However, DC being the way it is, seems to be very comfortable in maintaining the current status quo when it comes to doing the business of politics and could be very resistant to any so called &#039;new bipartisan ideas&#039;.I was just wondering out loud and not knocking OBama in particular; just all the Presidental candidates in general.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="icono1, post: 37368, member: 370"] Thanks for the explanation in post 18. It explains a lot about the situation and the inevitability of the OBama nomination. However, you explanatory post 18 was not showing on my machine at the time I made the latter post, now post 19 (which is "The question is will the change be 'real change' and for the better of all or will it be the 'same ol same ol' masquerading as change which will only support the political and financial status quo."), about questioning how much real political change is actually in the future irregardless of who wins and irregardless of the current promises made by the candidates on either side. From what I've been hearing all the candidates are promising some kind of 'change'. However, DC being the way it is, seems to be very comfortable in maintaining the current status quo when it comes to doing the business of politics and could be very resistant to any so called 'new bipartisan ideas'. I was just wondering out loud and not knocking OBama in particular; just all the Presidental candidates in general. [/QUOTE]

Verification