Once again, Trump denies saying what he said.

[PLC1]

Dana Bash (CNN): “My question for you is, first of all, it sounds like you admitted that you hadn't paid federal taxes and that that was smart. Is that what you meant to say?

Trump: “No, I didn't say that at all.”
​

source


from the debate:

Or maybe he does not want the American people, all of you watching tonight, to know that he has paid nothing in federal taxes because the only years that anybody has ever seen for a couple of years where he had to turn them over to state authorities when he was trying to get a casino license. And they showed he did not pay any federal income tax.
DONALD TRUMP
That makes me smart.

Trump has a habit of forgetting his own words.

 

[Old_Trapper70]

He said the same thing about the birther question, the woman who won the Ms. Universe contest, and the list goes on. Hillary was right about one thing, Trump has his own reality, and his Trumpkins follow him into the depths of his depravity:

http://fortune.com/2016/09/27/donald-trump-lied/

"According to one estimate, Trump made more than 34 comments that were either lies or mis-statements of fact during the debate. Clinton, by comparison, was tagged with four. According to much of the post-debate analysis, Trump also came off looking like a bully."


Hillary may have been smiling, however, people like Dog won't give a damn.

 

[TROY SCHLAHT]

yes i agree why is he deigning it and not working with Canada that also goes the same with our prime minister what are they up in our governments to

 

[Texas_tea]

source


from the debate:



Trump has a habit of forgetting his own words.

You are bleating fake news.

That comment was taken out of context.

Trump is correct.

He did not say that in that context.

Trump was referring to taking advantage of tax write offs so that you limit the amount of taxes you pay to the federal government.

Which is SMART.

Trump was not referring to NOT paying his taxes as Dana Bash of fake news CNN is accusing the President of.

We all know the President has paid mass amounts of federal taxes.

Remember when Rachel Madcow of fake news MSDNC got the copy of Trump's 2005 tax return and was shocked to find out he had paid in 38 million dollars in taxes?

Of course you do ......

I honestly wonder if you guys are really that gullible or if you are intentionally being disingenuous.

 

[PLC1]

You are bleating fake news.

That comment was taken out of context.

Trump is correct.

He did not say that in that context.

Trump was referring to taking advantage of tax write offs so that you limit the amount of taxes you pay to the federal government.

Which is SMART.

Trump was not referring to NOT paying his taxes as Dana Bash of fake news CNN is accusing the President of.

We all know the President has paid mass amounts of federal taxes.

Remember when Rachel Madcow of fake news MSDNC got the copy of Trump's 2005 tax return and was shocked to find out he had paid in 38 million dollars in taxes?

Of course you do ......

I honestly wonder if you guys are really that gullible or if you are intentionally being disingenuous.

I'm only one guy.

I know it's hard to believe that one person can come up with all of the brilliant reparte that I post, but that's how it is.

But, if I were really gullible, I'd have voted for the conman and fraud, instead of voting against both of the two major party candidates.

Now, where are those tax returns again? Other presidents have shown them, but Trump has something to hide. What is it?

 

[Texas_tea]

I'm only one guy.

I know it's hard to believe that one person can come up with all of the brilliant reparte that I post, but that's how it is.

But, if I were really gullible, I'd have voted for the conman and fraud, instead of voting against both of the two major party candidates.

Now, where are those tax returns again? Other presidents have shown them, but Trump has something to hide. What is it?

You are really gullible.

Trump is not required to show his tax returns.

It's probably best you stay in the world of the fake news MSM.

The truth may be a little complicated for the sheeple.

 

[PLC1]

You are really gullible.

Trump is not required to show his tax returns.

It's probably best you stay in the world of the fake news MSM.

The truth may be a little complicated for the sheeple.

No, Trump is not required to show his tax returns. He would only do so to disprove the idea that he has something to hide. Obama was not required to show his birth certificate, either, He only did so to disprove the silly birthers.

But, you're right: The truth is too complicated for the sheeple. Were that not so, Trump would never have won the election.

 

[Texas_tea]

No, Trump is not required to show his tax returns. He would only do so to disprove the idea that he has something to hide. Obama was not required to show his birth certificate, either, He only did so to disprove the silly birthers.

But, you're right: The truth is too complicated for the sheeple. Were that not so, Trump would never have won the election.

You are delusional.

The Democrats hold less seats in Congress than since the 1920's.

There's a reason for that.

 

[PLC1]

You are delusional.

The Democrats hold less seats in Congress than since the 1920's.

There's a reason for that.

The reason there are fewer Democrats in Congress than there once were is that people have been voting for Republicans.

It's unlikely that they will continue to do so. For one thing, the Congressional majority is cyclical: Sometimes, the Republicans dominate, sometimes the Democrats do.

And it doesn't seem to make a lot of difference which party dominates.

But, since the 1920's? Now, that's delusional.

 

[Texas_tea]

The reason there are fewer Democrats in Congress than there once were is that people have been voting for Republicans.

It's unlikely that they will continue to do so. For one thing, the Congressional majority is cyclical: Sometimes, the Republicans dominate, sometimes the Democrats do.

And it doesn't seem to make a lot of difference which party dominates.

But, since the 1920's? Now, that's delusional.

You really aren't that informed about current politics are you?

When Obama took office, there were 60 Democratic senators; now there are 46. The number of House seats held by Democrats has shrunk from 257 to 188.

There are now nine fewer Democratic governors than in 2009. Democrats currently hold fewer elected offices nationwide than at any time since the 1920s.

https://www.npr.org/2016/03/04/4690...crushed-during-the-obama-presidency-heres-why

 

[PLC1]

You really aren't that informed about current politics are you?

When Obama took office, there were 60 Democratic senators; now there are 46. The number of House seats held by Democrats has shrunk from 257 to 188.

There are now nine fewer Democratic governors than in 2009. Democrats currently hold fewer elected offices nationwide than at any time since the 1920s.

https://www.npr.org/2016/03/04/4690...crushed-during-the-obama-presidency-heres-why

Why is that? From your link:

How did this happen?
1. There are two different electorates in America

There is Presidential Election America, where turnout is diverse. The electorate is younger, browner, more single, more secular — more Democratic. Then there's Midterm Election America, where the electorate is older, whiter, more rural, more church-going — in other words, more Republican. What's great for Republicans and bad for Democrats is that the vast majority of the governorships and state legislative seats are elected in the midterms.

The upcoming midterm elections will be very interesting. Will the Democrats stage a comeback in spite of the above?

If they do, why?

 

[Texas_tea]

Why is that? From your link:



The upcoming midterm elections will be very interesting. Will the Democrats stage a comeback in spite of the above?

If they do, why?

The Democrats will not ..

This is the issue you must address ....

 

[PLC1]

The Democrats will not ..

This is the issue you must address ....

Well, we'll see. Maybe the Democrats will stage a comeback in November, and maybe not.

If they do regain one or both houses of Congress, to what should we attribute that comeback? Your link shows that midterm elections are generally not good for Democrats. Could it be a change in the Republican Party?

 

[YehYah]

The reason there are fewer Democrats in Congress than there once were is that people have been voting for Republicans.

Personal attack removed

Best of all to you,
YEH YAH

 

[PLC1]

Brilliant, absolutely brilliant, you obviously breezed right through first grade algebra.

I'd love to see the algebraic formula for that conclusion, but I'm sure it's a secret that you wouldn't wish to share with others.

Wishing some of that math genius could rub off on us,

Best of all to you,
YEH YAH

You don't think that there are more Republicans because people have been voting for them? What is your theory, then?