Reply to thread


I would agree. But it is worth noting a few things here, firstly, it was the Palin campaign who released the information that Bristol was pregnant.

 It was a result of a long whispered rumor that came from the far right that Sarah was claiming she was pregnant to cover for Bristol with the birth of Trig. I would much rather have had the whole issue be left out of the media, but that is the risk all politicians make when they involve thier families in the campaign. It makes them fair game. 


I would agree with this, in terms of its relevancy to the subject. The irony runs thick when the proponents of abstinence only education effects them directly.


Back
Top