Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
If there were even two facts the courts never looked at, and there is no way courts looked at all the facts, then Paul was right.Rand Paul rejects claim courts ruled no election fraud occurred: They found 'excuse' to sit it out | Washington ExaminerRand Paul rejects claim courts ruled no election fraud occurred: They found 'excuse' to sit it outby Andrew Mark Miller, Deputy Social Media Editor |December 16, 2020 03:04 PMSen. Rand Paul rejected the idea that courts have "decided the facts" on the integrity of November's presidential election.“The courts have not decided the facts,” Paul said Wednesday during a hearing on the integrity of the 2020 election. “The courts never looked at the facts. The courts don’t like elections, and they stayed out of it by finding an excuse.”
If there were even two facts the courts never looked at, and there is no way courts looked at all the facts, then Paul was right.
Rand Paul rejects claim courts ruled no election fraud occurred: They found 'excuse' to sit it out | Washington Examiner
Rand Paul rejects claim courts ruled no election fraud occurred: They found 'excuse' to sit it out
by Andrew Mark Miller, Deputy Social Media Editor |
December 16, 2020 03:04 PM
Sen. Rand Paul rejected the idea that courts have "decided the facts" on the integrity of November's presidential election.
“The courts have not decided the facts,” Paul said Wednesday during a hearing on the integrity of the 2020 election. “The courts never looked at the facts. The courts don’t like elections, and they stayed out of it by finding an excuse.”
