Reply to thread

Mr. Ramsland also points to scanner log entries that show “Override Options” were enabled for several classes of ballots. He mistakenly claims that these settings “allow[] any operator to change those votes” (¶J.5). “This gives the system operators carte blanche to adjudicate ballots,” he further claims (¶J.6). In actuality, the “Override Options” refer to situations where the scanner warns 42 a voter that they may have made a mistake when marking their ballot, such as an overvote or undervote. If the override option is enabled, voters are allowed to acknowledge the warnings and cause the scanner to accept their ballots despite the error conditions. These settings have nothing to do with “overriding” voters’ selections, and they do not mean the ballots will be sent to adjudication


god that ramsland is stupid. lol


Back
Top