Conclusion
Motion to reconsider granted so Susan's ruling is upheld: BLACK, CARNES and MARCUS are MOOT as they are guilty of treason. The death penalty may now be carried out IF and only IF they do not revoke the waiver of their right by hearing this case in person or issuing an order AGAINST Obama, Roberts and the US not against reason thus against our Constitution, or, for WE, the people. A federal judge is to know: By their very design federal judges are to be intentionally constitutional and intentionally of good behavior. Is your defense that you never, ever read the Federalist Papers not even when I printed them out for you? Or is it what physicists claim: Photons, exactly like federal judges, behave differently if they know they are being watched. Add an observer? Photons seem to act as if they’ve adopted a conscience.
Federalist 78: “To avoid an arbitrary discretion in the courts, it is indispensable that they should be bound down by strict rules and precedents, which serve to define and point out their duty in every particular case that comes before them; and it will readily be conceived from the variety of controversies which grow out of the folly and wickedness of mankind, that the records of those precedents must unavoidably swell to a very considerable bulk, and must demand long and laborious study to acquire a competent knowledge of them. Hence it is, that there can be but few men in the society who will have sufficient skill in the laws to qualify them for the stations of judges. And making the proper deductions for the ordinary depravity of human nature, the number must be still smaller of those who unite the requisite integrity with the requisite knowledge... Upon the whole, there can be no room to doubt that the convention acted wisely in copying from the models of those constitutions which have established good behavior as the tenure of their judicial offices...”
I will let the citizens know the outcome or consequences of BLACK, CARNES and MARCUS’ own bad ideas that thankfully are not our law. This ruling in the form of a motion to reconsider constitutes an arrest warrant upon a charge of treason as well as other acts of sedition and subversion. Did I not tell you the only choice you had was confer the moral authority or will upon your own self? You had better hope the Chief Justice, Department of Justice or I get you before the People do.
If this order, the 11th District’s not my own, is not bad behavior then what is? These criminal ‘judges’ said I, Susan, made it all up as in American history never happened. Well then, what do you call August 3rd, 2009 if not American history?
ENTERED AND ORDERED AUGUST 5th, 2009.
Susan Herbert,
The acting, legal President and Commander in Chief, as I am,
As my will, my reasoning, my one vote, the equal protection and due process clauses and Marbury make it so
You can't see my underlining or italics but it matters not. Anyway, you have been informed. When the Solicitor General waived your interest and your right? YOU FAILED TO OBJECT AS WELL! 
BTW: If it is treason? It is then a violation of the Logan Act. They are basically one and the same but Logan assumes you have not negotiated with with the enemy. If it is treason it is Logan but if it is Logan it may not neccessarily be treason.
