Put up or shut up as in stop writing words you can never support in any actual, legal court of law like SCOTUS and that only serve to prove your own guilt as your words prove you to be repugnant thus your order is void: “the Constitution's written nature, and the formal enumeration of the powers of government would be empty promises if there were no means to measure the actions of the government against the Constitution, and strike down those found wanting (see Marbury, supra, at 177) "[c]ertainly all those who have framed written constitutions contemplate them as forming the fundamental and paramount law of the nation, and consequently the theory of every such government must be, that an act of the legislature repugnant to the constitution is void’”. As the Act is void then you are null and voided. So then: TeamLaw is correct regarding some things one of which is the five month disparity between the signing of the treaty with the UN. I’m the acting, legal President and Commander of original jurisdiction. Ideally you want to unseat the crooks like the judges on this very bench and then reseat them with ethical and moral persons. You do not want TWO governments, you do not want a shadow one and you do not want foreigners running this nation and killing the People. You want to export US law not import socialism, Marxism, fascism, materialism, communism, despotism, dictatorship or religious extremism. You also do not want to institute STUPID, AFRAID or CROOK as qualifications. I unincorporated you by dissolving all kinds of mistaken beliefs and corruptions thus liability does indeed ensue as you knew as I told you. Legally you never were incorporated and me? I never agreed. Then whatever that thing was that you called a government? Even you, the US, defaulted upon that beast. Even you could not stand that. Upon reading what original jurisdiction is you legally must reverse your ruling or when I do eventually win - physically win as legally it has happened - as the people finally suffer so much they are moved to support my win even with violence if that is necessary? You have set yourself up for death as the fifth amendment says WE do not need to convene a grand jury in this case to then charge, try and convict you thus hang you. You were told to command, correct? I am a keen observer and I have keenly and wisely observed you not only violated the law but you named no actual reason. NOTHING AT ALL. You said it is DISMISSED and MOOT but not WHY. You did exactly quote Rule 42-4 not law 40-2 citing "ENTIRELY WITHOUT MERIT" meaning you looked right at the SCOTUS docket but then DENIED and DISMISSED it or CONFESSED TO YOUR GUILT IN WRITING! You are saying that WE, the people aka the Constitution is entirely without merit so the Founders are without merit and that my birth is without merit for if the Revolution was never fought and I was never born in America naturally? I never would have entered SCOTUS, the US never would have defaulted on 11/05/08 and Roberts never would have acted on 11/20/08. You would not have pressed your judicial luck by writing and issuing this unconstitutional order. Are you serious? Do you truly believe WE are this silly or that WE would ever come to believe the Revolution was not fought? I told you within my brief: "You can make an attempt to defeat the universe but guess what? Only the mentally ill or insane do that." I take it then your plea is insane? As you are claiming Roberts’s action is w/o merit? That he too is ‘crazy’ and cannot read? That he acting as Chief Justice is delusional and frivolous or he’s lying to himself about US law and his own abilities thus is manifestly futile? That like you some disembodied being put a pen in his hand and a gun to his head forced him to write "DENIED" any and all protection of the law? You made a mistake: Roberts never said any such thing. He's not mentally ill and can and does reason. You, unlike he, wrote "MOOT". Exactly. YES, I AGREE AS WE ALL DO: THE DECLARATION AND CONSTITUTION IS NOW MOOT AS OFFICERS LIKE YOU RENDER IT MOOT VIA YOUR ACTIONS THUS I WIN AGAIN AS YOU CONCURRED! YOU’RE MY PROOF OF DEATH!
2. I have a volunteer. It was not humanly possible for him to act before he read my brief as SCOTUS denied him informed consent thus now he can and may. Upon re-entry to SCOTUS? He or any willing volunteer then joins my case thus appearing in the caption. That makes him Vice President. He's a voter acting in his official capacity as a voter as well as an individual. If he chooses not to continue? Next person to get to me and volunteer wins. Upon our win he then gets his name on the ballot for President in 2012 as a candidate independent from me or in his own right. This then makes us, WE, the People, the government not the business, a brand new case of original jurisdiction. I have reasoned I can enter several ways to make it NEW or ORIGINAL as I ruled all citizens were ignorant not guilty like you are as you are an expert lawyer now exploiting your knowledge and your office thus abusing your power. The ignorant now not so ignorant are to get one opportunity. Thus, you want to reconsider if you exist as a judge and as a living, breathing human being let alone an American citizen as SCOTUS is waiting for me. Are you a corporate slave? A shill? A front man? You are not a foreigner thus you cannot escape the death penalty by claiming you are not bound by the Constitution. You are or else you would not be acting like a lunatic federal judge who is so traitorous he or she cashed a money order that read TRIBUTE across it and then wrote DENIED and MOOT. Sorry! I not only want a refund but the voters and I want a refund with interest: you gone as that is in our best interest. And someone has volunteered to help me make that happen sooner rather than later. He’s pro se too. For good measure I did not stop fishing for men: I have fond another willing volunteer. This man cannot read thus it was not humanly possible for him to know. Illiteracy? Not his fault. He met me and he made his case to me so we know he acted in his own defense thus he has clean hands.
3. You may not issue an ORDER instructing a clerk to commit what is a violation of the Constitution and is a criminal act known as treason. Marbury V Madison clearly states all people are each accountable and responsible thus if that order is obeyed in open and direct violation of the letter of the law, its spirit or both and which is in violation of Marbury? The clerk is the liable as they are to defy such an order as it itself is unconstitutional as it cites RULE not law and as it ignores and denies every fact and all law of the US. I clearly stated that this court would not know liberty as it could not as it was not willing to preserve, protect and defend our law in my unique case, in the cases of women and in the cases of all ethical or law abiding Americans, a part of which its spirit aka liberty. This sham of a decision, ruling and order is evidence rising to proof and the person or people who wrote it? Proof of all I claimed. Are you, the judges of this bench, denying your own miserable existence? Oh that’s right! Life ain’t so hard for you is it? As you have all of the overly broad power, as you have all of the tribute and as you have all of the physical comforts you could ask for including a lifetime appointment and never-ending paycheck as a direct result of tribute. My decision: Not if your appointment was never legal and you just proved it for me!
4. This is rich: The third thing you do not know that you want to reconsider is EVERYTHING I DO IS DELIBERATE. In SCOTUS? As life not paper is proof I went out on a limb, I stepped out on faith, GOOD FAITH, and told another human being who I can produce for SCOTUS: "I predict August, the Appellate will rule in August as August has been a very big month for me." Now, if the Creator, SCOTUS, the Founders and I and most if not all of the People were not conspiring against you, the Federal Appellate Corporation, that is, if you were acting constitutionally or in accordance with our law aka WE, the people, how could I know August? How could I ever accurately predict your actions if there was no pattern? There is a pattern. Your act of crime is dated August 3rd. It arrived at my home August 5th. I do not possess ESP but I do have the science, the history, the Declaration, the Constitution plus my own will thus the Creator – LAW - on my side. The pattern is: the law is not on your side. Mostly you are not even aware of the actual law at work. I ask you: Is this ruling and order US law at work??? No as it is your whim and will at work. It’s your work masquerading as something legal but barely.
