Reply to thread

Well you could wait and let me see how it goes...:)


I'll say this in clear unequivocal terms... It depends!.:D


I say that about our economy in general because there is some overlapping. For instance Bush #41 wasn't nearly as bad handling the economy as Reagan was but Reagan was seen as doing well and Bush bad... which it was... but the reason it was wasn't much his fault. Bush #41 got left holding the bag on Reagan's huge deficit spending. When Bush #41 called Reagan's trickle-down economics voodoo economics he was actually quite correct. 


But I'll answer your question directly: Whenever there is a leader that takes bold steps to try and change a major problem and that problem ends up becoming better... that leader deserves high marks and credit.   


Back
Top