Dispute what I have to say or just move along
I just went back over the posts in this thread ... the only facts are the ones I posted. You, on the other hand, make grandiose claims without proof. So, let's get back to the facts .... and we'll use your post to do it. All quotes are from your previous post.
The rich dont need any help, theyve taken it all, Im all about the working man who has been raped by big corporated greed outsourcing for a few bucks. No american should work and be on food stamps. .
GREAT opinion statement - not a fact in the bunch. Thank you for your opinion.
The far right expects people to work for peanuts, not earning enough to buy the basics, then they talk about no worker deserves a pension, Social Security and Medicare need to be cut or abolished.
WONDERFUL ad hominem attack - not a fact in the bunch. Thank you for your opinion.
The fight to keep the minimum wage from being raised, stop unemployment for workers that cant find a job then turn around and people like you think its just perfect to give the richest industry in this country, who has no competition, who has never posted a loss, FREE BILLIONS in taxpayer cash on top of their record breaking cash.
Twisted reality ... it, of course, is false. As usual, you have failed to think it through .. the reality is actually completely different than the picture you try to paint. You try to create this vision of an armored truck, backing up to the oil company's door, and depositing FREE BILLIONS in taxpayer cash. Reality, of course, is completely different.
The true reality is this ... oil companies receive no "FREE BILLIONS in taxpayer cash". They receive tax credits, not cash. You know --- tax credits, those things Cuomo is giving companies to come to NY state, and DeBlasio is giving to companies to move to NYC. You paint this simplistic, naive, and absolutely erroneous picture that tax money is going into the pockets of rich, fat cat, oil company magnates. The truth is completely different. Those tax credits enable oil companies to produce energy CHEAPER - and who does cheaper energy disproportionally help? The poor and downtrodden whose fiscal throats you so blithely want to cut. Who gets hurt if the price of gas jumps to $6 per gallon? Do you seriously believe those 'rich fat cat, oil company magnates' care how much THEY pay for gas? The little guy gets hurt ... he's the one who foots the bill.
The cost of an item, any item, is made up of several factors - things like cost of raw materials, cost of production, labor at all the levels leading to the final product, overhead, real property, and taxes. The government decided that, in order to encourage oil and to keep the costs down, it was willing to forgo its slice of the pie. They didn't give money to oil companies - they forfeited their share.
Real facts - pesky things, aren't they?
In 2006 Exxon Mobil during a huge spike in oil prices gave their retiring CEO a Four hundred million Retirement Package <400,000,000> and thats on wee tiny bit of the taxpayer money oil is given while raping us at will at the pump and everything else thats made from oil.
Once again, twisted reality - and, once again, it is blatantly false (but, oh so convenient, huh?) Again, you try to paint this ridiculous picture of an oil executive grabbing money and running out the door.
Here is the reality:
The gentleman's name was Lee Raymond. "On April 14, 2006, it was reported that Raymond's retirement package was worth about $400 million, the largest in history for a U.S. public company. However, the majority of that sum consisted of retirement-independent salary, bonuses, stock options, and
restricted stock awards from his final year and prior years that, while high, are by no means unprecedented among major American CEOs. Retirement-specific payments in accordance with the standard pension plan provided to all ExxonMobil employees totaled around $100 million, calculated based on his over forty years of service and his salary upon retirement."
In short, he worked for it - it took him 40 years to create that nest egg, and he did it through smart investment techniques and, apparently, good job performance. He EARNED it. (What a unique concept!)
Oh, by the way ... Exxon's profits that year? $36 billion - on an expenditure of $371 billion - or about 10%. Funny how that works, huh?
Consider your post disputed ... well, more accurately, consider your post corrected - with facts, not emotion.
--------------------------------------
Now, as for your faux rage ... and you ain't even good that THAT ... nobody threatened you. It is childish to even try to twist the words to get there. You want to whine and complain about name calling, but you are the one who starts it ... check out post #4 ... until then, it was a (relatively) adult conversation.
I am surprised - no, I'm not - at the demeaning attitude you take against the workers in this country. You paint them as incapable and inept - you should be ashamed.