Judge overseeing the Trump trial for questioning the 2020 election refuses to require the DHS to prove the election was fair

[mark francis]

Democrats cannot prove the stolen election was fair and they will fight like hell against any demand for evidence that the election was fair. They want their election fraud hidden and they want Trump jailed, and that is what they have been all about since the 2020 election.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/new...HY+m9ieqC3uNWF5D2vsnnY57z&bt_ts=1729266428437 10-18-24

Judge blocks Trump’s request to probe DHS claim that 2020 election was ‘most secure’ in history​

 

[pjmret]

Democrats cannot prove the stolen election was fair and they will fight like hell against any demand for evidence that the election was fair. They want their election fraud hidden and they want Trump jailed, and that is what they have been all about since the 2020 election.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/oct/18/judge-blocks-donald-trumps-request-to-probe-dhs-cl/?utm_source=Boomtrain&utm_medium=subscriber&utm_campaign=newsalert&utm_content=newsalert&utm_term=newsalert&bt_ee=pVQl7gCzjRtNaBPqhc3/YUfGBB4FClM7X+Ka/IfHY+m9ieqC3uNWF5D2vsnnY57z&bt_ts=1729266428437 10-18-24

Judge blocks Trump’s request to probe DHS claim that 2020 election was ‘most secure’ in history​

good. judge is on trial here, not dhs. he has to prove the fraud. and he hasn't

 

[mark francis]

good. judge is on trial here, not dhs. he has to prove the fraud. and he hasn't

Democrats are trying to jail Trump for doubting the honesty of the 2020 election the Democrats not only cannot prove was honest but hire judges to prevent and efforts to determine whether the results were honest or not.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

No one has the right to invade Congress and smear shit on the walls. No one has the right to overthrow elections in our country.

 

[pjmret]

Democrats are trying to jail Trump for doubting the honesty of the 2020 election the Democrats not only cannot prove was honest but hire judges to prevent and efforts to determine whether the results were honest or not.

no, it wasn't for "doubting the honesty". read the indictments, legal mooron.
god you enjoy looking stupid lol

 

[mark francis]

No one has the right to invade Congress and smear shit on the walls. No one has the right to overthrow elections in our country.

Unsaved barbarians committed gross acts of violence in 2020 and afterward, and even contributed to the lesser amounts of tribal barbarian violence on Jan 6

 

[pjmret]

Unsaved barbarians committed gross acts of violence in 2020 and afterward, and even contributed to the lesser amounts of tribal barbarian violence on Jan 6

so you are blaming the acts of people on jan 6 on other people?
you right wing moorons are always blaming others.
no wonder you give a free pass to trump.

 

[mark francis]

no, it wasn't for "doubting the honesty". read the indictments, legal mooron.
god you enjoy looking stupid lol

The judge refused to allow Trump's lawyers to request evidence from the DHS for why they claimed the 2020 election was relatively free from fraud. There is no excuse for that effort to hide the fact that nobody has proven the 2020 election was not tainted by fraud.

 

[pjmret]

The judge refused to allow Trump's lawyers to request evidence from the DHS for why they claimed the 2020 election was relatively free from fraud. There is no excuse for that effort to hide the fact that nobody has proven the 2020 election was not tainted by fraud.

again, it wasn't for "doubting the honesty", legal *****. it was for actions he took.
read the indictment so you dont look so stupid next time.

but since you are stupid AND lazy, i'm sure you wont

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

The judge refused to allow Trump's lawyers to request evidence from the DHS for why they claimed the 2020 election was relatively free from fraud. There is no excuse for that effort to hide the fact that nobody has proven the 2020 election was not tainted by fraud.

No, that is NOT how it works. Just as you do not have the obligation to prove you are not an asshole.

All accusations need to be proven that they are valid before they can be presented as evidence.

 

[mark francis]

again, it wasn't for "doubting the honesty", legal *****. it was for actions he took.
read the indictment so you dont look so stupid next time.

but since you are stupid AND lazy, i'm sure you wont

The judge refused to allow Trump's lawyers to question them about where they came up with the unsupported claim that no significant fraud occurred in 2020.

 

[pjmret]

The judge refused to allow Trump's lawyers to question them about where they came up with the unsupported claim that no significant fraud occurred in 2020.

Nothing to do with why he was indicted
You might be the dumbest person here lol

 

[mark francis]

Nothing to do with why he was indicted
You might be the dumbest person here lol

The judge stopped lawyers from asking where the DHS got the idea that no significant voter fraud occurred in 2020, leaving US with no answers as to where anyone got the idea that no significant fraud occurred in 2020.

 

[pjmret]

The judge stopped lawyers from asking where the DHS got the idea that no significant voter fraud occurred in 2020, leaving US with no answers as to where anyone got the idea that no significant fraud occurred in 2020.

Nothing to do with why he was indicted
You might be the dumbest person here lol

 

[mark francis]

Nothing to do with why he was indicted
You might be the dumbest person here lol

The fact that Trump was indicted for questioning the 2020 election that has never been proven to have been without fraud is very bad for Democrats.