One is killed early, and one is killed later.
So Jews in Russia and Germany were not murders either? It's only our opinion?
I'd vote for that! Sadly, I have to conclude that the IRS is only doing what the government mandates. Instead lets put the politicians on trial!
Agreed. But this is why conservatives support the lowest possible taxes, and the smallest government possible.
No, liberals are trying to impose their view of marriage on the rest of society. I just don't want "marriage" to change. Leave things the way they are. One man, one woman, is what marriage is.
What you are claiming is that we are imposing our views, on people, when our views is what already is.
If I start running around saying red means stop, and green means go. "GAH! You are imposing your views on society!"... no... red has always meant stop and green always meant go. I'm not imposing anything, just supporting the current meaning.
Now you come along and say purple means stop and white means go, and claiming that I am the one trying to impose my view. Sorry, that doesn't work.
I'm saying one man, one woman, is what marriage is, because that's what marriage is. I'm imposing nothing because it's always been that way. You are claiming to change it to mean something else. YOU are the one imposing a view on society. Not me.
This seems a sad commentary on the progress of society. You realize that not even 100 years ago, that mothers actually would want to give their lives for the child? There was a time in America when mothers thought it their highest calling to risk death for their child. Now, in a selfish ruled society, the mother is far more important. If she doesn't want the child, kill it. If it might endanger her, kill it. If it might cramp her style, or ruin her social life, kill it.
I'm not going to argue with the 'collection of cells' crap, because anyone who studies abortion knows that by the time you can abort a baby, it has it's own heart, arms and legs, and can feel pain.
I was adopted, and perhaps my biological mother was raped. Is it ok to kill me? If not, why then a child at any other level of development?
A doctor that performed this under this law, did so under the current law. It should be changed to reflect it being murder that it is. Thus under the new law, yes doctors should be prosecuted.
The court says that murdering a child isn't murder. That doesn't make it so.
Well I simply define murder. What is murder? If it is a human (√), and it's alive (√), and it had not committed any crime worthy of death (√), then... it's murder.
Do you have an alternative to the text book version of murder? Or are you asking why murder is wrong?
