Your amateur psychoanalyzing is hardly profound, David, you have misread me on more than one occasion and you continue to do so. Fine, if your arrogant attitude makes you feel superior, then I'm happy for you because you obviously need it.
I'm not sure how one would provide physical evidence of the hypothetical ghost in the machine since it is by definition non-physical--Hello? Using your "objective" viewpoint I suppose that you believe that love doesn't exist either since you can't see, smell it, or put it in a petri dish. Many things are non-physical, mathematics can be written down but the concepts are non-physical, what about imaginary numbers?
You keep demanding, demanding, demanding, why? It doesn't matter what sources I give you they aren't worth your looking at them. Yeah, and your drug accusation, I like that. All the cosmologists in history were on drugs. I notice that you never answer my questions, why is that?
You don't converse, David, you simply argue and you don't even do that very well, your name calling and idiotic drug references coupled with your somewhat dim demands for physical evidence of a non-physical experience suggest to me that you are a troll. I have enough trolls in my life without adding another to the list. Thanks for playing, but I do know you well enough to deem you unworthy of further discussion, please jerk off with someone else from now on.
