There goes Pale Rider, still valiantly defending the unborn. Since you care about unborns so much let me propose this idea/solution to you...
You know, we keep hearing stories about how medical science is close to mimicking a womb in a male. If it comes to fruition, would you support removing the fetus from the female and implanting it in a womb surgically created in the biological father? Here's a better idea - what if we insist that all males that reach puberty have surgically created wombs and then, if they get a female pregnant, the male will have to take his own responsibility for his actions.
You would support that, right? Because, the fetus has a shot at life. The male, of course, would have the responsibility of rearing the infant.
Science isn't quite there yet, but, just think - a way to make you happy AND make women who don't want to carry a pregnancy happy. Win-win.
Come on Pale Rider, do it for the unborn children 
This is nothing but a hypothetical Pale Rider to see if you are truly interested in "saving the babies" as you claim, or if you are more interested in controlling women's reproductive rights. I'm betting its the latter.
There's another option on the horizon as well. Artificial wombs.
https://www.geneticliteracyproject.o...erless-births/
This opens up a whole new set of hypotheticals. And so I would ask you - would this make you happy? Supposing a woman does not want to give birth, would you support the biological father being held responsible for paying for this process and then for rearing the child?
