Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
I gave you across the board references....the only one denying the facts is you...but if you want more...sure.Multiple Pregnancy: Epidemiology, Gestation, and Perinatal Outcome"...subsequently the implanted embryo undergoes binary fission two then to four MZ embryos"There are plenty of other BOOKS on the topic of cloning that describe the splitting of blastocysts and zygotes as fission as that is what the process it called...feel free to explore the topic or deny as you wish....I am not going to go about doing your research for you. If you believe the references I provided simply made up the biological references to fission they mentioned then by all means prove it....disregarding information as untrue simply based on the source is.......wait for it.....yet another logical fallacy...how utterly unsurprising.And you believe a philosopher can't possess biological knowledge? What is your specific education that allows you to disregard what he has to say? Your claim is just another logical fallacy on your part.Do you have any idea what sort of education a bio ethicist must have...especially to be in the employ of an institution such as Oxford? Do try to learn something.If all you can muster is one logical fallacy after another why not just quit? They don't represent any sort of argument and do nothing but highlight your lack of knowledge.
I gave you across the board references....the only one denying the facts is you...but if you want more...sure.
Multiple Pregnancy: Epidemiology, Gestation, and Perinatal Outcome
"...subsequently the implanted embryo undergoes binary fission two then to four MZ embryos"
There are plenty of other BOOKS on the topic of cloning that describe the splitting of blastocysts and zygotes as fission as that is what the process it called...feel free to explore the topic or deny as you wish....I am not going to go about doing your research for you. If you believe the references I provided simply made up the biological references to fission they mentioned then by all means prove it....disregarding information as untrue simply based on the source is.......wait for it.....yet another logical fallacy...how utterly unsurprising.
And you believe a philosopher can't possess biological knowledge? What is your specific education that allows you to disregard what he has to say? Your claim is just another logical fallacy on your part.
Do you have any idea what sort of education a bio ethicist must have...especially to be in the employ of an institution such as Oxford? Do try to learn something.
If all you can muster is one logical fallacy after another why not just quit? They don't represent any sort of argument and do nothing but highlight your lack of knowledge.
