Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
Here is what the court ruled:IV. CONCLUSIONIT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10), plaintiffs’ cross-motion for summary disposition is GRANTED in part with respect to Count II of the amended complaint because the guidance issued by the Secretary of State on October 6, 2020, with respect to signature-matching standards was issued in violation of the Administrative Procedures Act.In other words, the Michigan SOS broke the law with his amended voter-fraud friendly directive, just weeks before the election.
Here is what the court ruled:
IV.
CONCLUSION
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10), plaintiffs’ cross-motion for summary disposition is GRANTED in part with respect to Count II of the amended complaint because the guidance issued by the Secretary of State on October 6, 2020, with respect to signature-matching standards was issued in violation of the Administrative Procedures Act.
In other words, the Michigan SOS broke the law with his amended voter-fraud friendly directive, just weeks before the election.
