Reply to thread

OK, good. Let's by all means start with a false dichotomy. 




followed up by a mis statement of the position of 97% of scientists and 100% of all scientific organizations on Earth....




and then follow that with an ad hominem...



Good job.


Of course, you've taken an untenable position, so ad hominem, false dichotomy... that's about all you have to argue with. 


The original statement was that only 3% of scientific papers counter basic AGW theory, and that the 3% have been found to be riddled with errors, much as your arguments are riddled with errors. 


Here is a source you can use for future arguments.


Back
Top