Ok, show me a history of where CD, Bonds, mutual funds, or other types of investments, have had the same increasing cost, and declining benefit, as social security. Once again your using hearsay to fight historical evidence.
No, but I can and will vote for those who support dismantling or allowing opt-out for it.
Yeah, that worked so well in the past 3 times it's been "shored up".
Note that Obama plans to spend 1.8 Trillion in his first year. That's $150 Billion a month. Are you against Overspend Obama?
Btw, there was no surplus with Clinton. The "surplus" was the very borrowed cash from Social Security you claim he should not have taken. Also, in case you don't remember, Clinton spent the non-"surplus", and didn't shore up Social Security with it's own money, either.
If anyone is living in a mentally unstable false reality, it's you. You didn't know the surplus was stolen funds from S.S., you can't prove historically any of your points, you complain about $12 Billion a month in spending, when your own guy plans to spend $150 Billion a month. You are practically a basket case living in your own made up world. Rather pathetic.
Oh and FYI, Clinton was so against the republican welfare reform, he openly claimed he would go back and fix it. Good thing he didn't, welfare reform worked perfectly.
Which is why he voted the first 2 copies of the bill. The republicans had to cram it down his throat to force him to sign it. Oh and btw, it was the exact same bill. There was nothing different between the first 2 and the 3rd one he signed. So much for "working together". More like "beating into submission".
I'm all for Obama working together on conservative legislation. As long as he keep supporting conservative policies, I'll deal with him. The moment he starts his liberal crap, you can kiss that cooperation goodbye.
Btw, did you see his latest appointment to the VA office? A true war-hawk. I love it when Obama sticks it straight to his liberal pacifist wimps.
