Please feel free to review the following information, the get back to me, yes? I will do the usual 'I told you so's' later.
1) Why did Elie Wiesel and countless other Jews survive the Holocaust
if it was the intention of the Third Reich to eliminate every Jew they
got there hands on? Elie was a prisoner for several years; other Jews
survived even longer. Most of these ''survivors'' were ordinary
people who did not have any unique expertise that the Germans could
have exploited for their war effort. There was no logical reason for
them to be kept alive. The very existence of more than a million
survivors even today, some sixty years later, contradicts one of the
basic components of the holocaust i.e. that the Germans had a policy to
eliminate every Jew they got their hands on.
2) Why is their no mention of the Holocaust in Churchill's six volume
History of the Second World War or the wartime memoirs of either De
Gaulle or Eisenhower or any of the other lesser luminaries who wrote
about the Second World War. Keep in mind all these were written years
after the war ended and thus after the holocaust had been allegedly
proven by the Nuremberg Trials? With regard to the Holocaust, the
silence of these " cognoscenti " is deafening!
3) What was an inmate infirmary (and a brothel) doing in Auschwitz if
in fact it was a death camp?
4) Why would the Germans round up Jews from their far flung empire,
thereby tying up large numbers of personnel and rolling stock, while
fighting a world war on two fronts to deliver people to ''death
camps'' hundreds of miles away who were then executed upon
arrival...wouldn't a bullet on the spot have appealed to legendary
German sense of efficiency?
5) Why after sixty years have historians been unable to come up with a
single German document that points to a holocaust? Should we believe
the likes of Raul Hilburg that in the place of written orders there was
an "incredible meeting of the minds" by the literally tens of
thousands of people who would have had to coordinate their actions in
order to carry out an undertaking of this magnitude.
6) How come it is still insisted upon that six million Jews were killed
when the official Jewish death toll at Auschwitz, the flagship of the
Holocaust gulag, has been reduced from an immediate post war figure of
3 million, to a figure of somewhat less than one million? Why do many
respond to this observation by saying, " what's the difference
whether it's six million or one million''. The answer is that the
difference is five million. Another difference is that saying so can
get you three years in an Austrian jail...just ask David Irving!
7) All of Germany's wartime codes were compromised including the one
used to send daily reports from Auschwitz to Berlin. The transcripts of
these messages make no mention of mass executions or even remotely
suggest a genocidal program in progress. Furthermore it has been
insisted that the Germans used a kind of euphemistic code when
discussing their extermination program of the Jews e.g. final solution,
special treatment, resettlement, etc. Why was it necessary for them to
use such coded euphemisms when talking to one another unless they
thought their codes had been cracked by the Allies?
Cool The water table at Auschwitz lies a mere 18 inches below the surface
which makes claims of huge burning pits for the disposal of tens of
thousands of victims untenable.
9) Initially claims were made that mass executions in homicidal gas
chambers had taken place in camps located within the boundaries of the
old Reich e.g. Dachau, Bergen-Belsen. ''Evidence'' to that
effect was every bit as compelling as what was offered for other camps,
located in occupied Poland, yet without explanation in the early
sixties we were told that this was not the case and that all the
''death camps'' were located in the East i.e. Poland outside
(some would say conveniently) of the probing eyes of western scholars.
10) No one has been able to reconcile the eyewitness accounts that
personnel entered the gas chambers after twenty minutes without any
protective gear and the fact that Zyclon B was a "time release"
fumigant that would have had a lethal capability for at least another
twenty-four hours. And that even after twenty-four hours the corpses
would have themselves remained sufficiently contaminated by the
hydrogen cyanide gas that they would have had the capacity to kill
anyone who touched them who were not wearing protective gear.
11) Why do we no longer hear claims that the Germans manufactured soap,
lamp shades and riding britches from the bodies of dead Jews...could it
be that in the light of modern forensics and DNA knowledge these claims
are totally untenable?
12) Why do we no longer hear claims that huge numbers of Jews were
exterminated in massive steam chambers or electrocuted on special
grids...''evidence'' of this was presented at
Nuremberg...evidence that sent men to the gallows.