I have to take issue with "error". That implies that they have merely failed to include enough due diligence to support what they posit. I don't grant them that pretty skirt to hide behind. At best they are whores who will say anything that brings research money in the door. At worse they are whores who will say anything that brings research money in the door. There is a substantial difference between standing behind your research and defending it in the face of other claims and ignoring, for years, the other side of the issue as though the science were settled. In science nothing is settled, ever, for all intents and purposes, especially in this day and age of constant re-assessment and discovery. The proper response should always begin with, "Let me see your data; I will study it closely and respond with why my data is more accurate/applicable." Then and only then the next step is a presentation with side-by-side data and conclusions followed by as public as possible peer review. Hash it out; debate it to death. I haven't seen or heard that. I have heard researchers get blackballed if they don't published "correctly".
Who knows what scientific procedure looks like? 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics ,"for experiments with entangled photons, establishing the violation of Bell inequalities and pioneering quantum information science", co-winner Dr. John F. Clauser calls climate change a giant hoax and is only the 1st shoe. What's even more important about what he says is all the so-called climate scientists are GUILTY of perpetuating POOR science. Are we to believe that the rest of science is any better as performed in all the same places that have validated the climate hoax; Wuhan wet-market origin; vaccine, lockdown & mask use efficacious; and medicine that doesn't recognize gender dysphoria is a mental illness crying out for counseling?
The Gaia Theory (James Lovelock, Lynn Margulis, 1972) includes the pivotal effects of clouds forming as the sun heats surface waters to some point; those clouds reduce the sun's energy reaching the surface below the clouds, cooling the surface. The difference between Earth and Mars is water. No water, -no media to change solar radiation into heat-reflecting clouds. Clouds exist within a small range and deliver rain to places with little water. No water, -no weather. No weather, only one climate can exist; that being day or night.
Settled science is merely a different way to say that the issue is closed. Only minds can be closed; -science? Never!
