Reply to thread

The argument here seems to, at least partially, be, "some scientists are politically motivated and therefore we can't listen to them."


Until you can conclusively prove that a scientist is being a sensationalist I really don't think that should be a viable argument, especially in light of the fact that (I'm assuming) no one here has a degree in climatology. I certainly don't. When all of you start going off about carbon dioxide variances and solar winds I'm completely lost and I'm only a little ashamed to admit it. People like me (and by that I mean anyone who hasn't taken the time to study in depth the science and earned a degree - or several - in it) have to rely on scientists for their information and if we can't...well, what's the point of arguing about it then?


Back
Top