Georgia democrat DEI judge shoots down Georgia election officials' voting security rules just weeks before the 2024 election

[mark francis]

Democrats are fighting like hell all across the nation to protect long standing democrat election fraud practices.

GDPR Support

www.ajc.com

Credit: Hyosub Shin/AJC



Attorney Chris Anulewicz (foreground) representing Republican plaintiffs speaks in front of Fulton County Superior Court Judge Thomas Cox (background) in a case against State Election Board rules in Fulton County Superior Court, Wednesday, October 16, 2024, in Atlanta. (Hyosub Shin / AJC)
By Mark Niesse
Updated 17 hours ago
A judge invalidated seven new Georgia election rules Wednesday, including requirements for a “reasonable inquiry” before elections are certified, hand counts on election night and additional access for partisan poll watchers.

Fulton County Superior Court Judge Thomas Cox Jr. declared the rules, passed by the State Election Board’s Republican majority, are “illegal, unconstitutional and void.”

 

[pjmret]

Republican Brad Raffensperger, who as secretary of state is Georgia's top election official, has said that the election board's "11th-hour" changes would damage voter confidence and burden election workers.

he's not a democrat, lying moooron. lol

 

[mark francis]

Republican Brad Raffensperger, who as secretary of state is Georgia's top election official, has said that the election board's "11th-hour" changes would damage voter confidence and burden election workers.

he's not a democrat, lying moooron. lol

Of course, the fake conservative leftist democrat darling opposes voting securities and voter fraud investigations. He is the seditious bozo who refused to investigate mountains of voting fraud evidence in his state in 2020. Investigators should look into his finances to see if he is getting richer from money that cannot be tracked to legitimate payments.

 

[pjmret]

Of course, the fake conservative leftist democrat darling opposes voting securities and voter fraud investigations. He is the seditious bozo who refused to investigate mountains of voting fraud evidence in his state in 2020. Investigators should look into his finances to see if he is getting richer from money that cannot be tracked to legitimate payments.

He's a Republican elected by republicans I'm sorry if facts make you look stupid actually I'm not at all sorry

 

[mark francis]

He's a Republican elected by republicans I'm sorry if facts make you look stupid actually I'm not at all sorry

Yes, he is a republican who turned a blind eye to massive voting fraud in his state in 2020, for whatever unknown reason.

 

[pjmret]

Yes, he is a republican who turned a blind eye to massive voting fraud in his state in 2020, for whatever unknown reason.

let me know when you mooorons prove this massive fraud.
until then, you are a hateful anti american moorons lol

why are you so stupid and hateful and anti american? unknown reasons

 

[Boris Norris]

Democrats are fighting like hell all across the nation to protect long standing democrat election fraud practices.

GDPR Support

www.ajc.com

Credit: Hyosub Shin/AJC

View attachment 17241

Attorney Chris Anulewicz (foreground) representing Republican plaintiffs speaks in front of Fulton County Superior Court Judge Thomas Cox (background) in a case against State Election Board rules in Fulton County Superior Court, Wednesday, October 16, 2024, in Atlanta. (Hyosub Shin / AJC)
By Mark Niesse
Updated 17 hours ago
A judge invalidated seven new Georgia election rules Wednesday, including requirements for a “reasonable inquiry” before elections are certified, hand counts on election night and additional access for partisan poll watchers.

Fulton County Superior Court Judge Thomas Cox Jr. declared the rules, passed by the State Election Board’s Republican majority, are “illegal, unconstitutional and void.”

Republican majority. Unconstitutional and void.

Need I read any further?

 

[mark francis]

let me know when you mooorons prove this massive fraud.
until then, you are a hateful anti american moorons lol

why are you so stupid and hateful and anti american? unknown reasons

How many voting machines images were illegally destroyed

let me know when you mooorons prove this massive fraud.
until then, you are a hateful anti american moorons lol

why are you so stupid and hateful and anti american? unknown reasons

Democrats cannot prove the election was clean in 2020 and the Trump-hating judge has blocked efforts by Trump's lawyers to ask the DHS where they got the supposed proof that no significant fraud occurred in 2020.

 

[pjmret]

How many voting machines images were illegally destroyed

Democrats cannot prove the election was clean in 2020 and the Trump-hating judge has blocked efforts by Trump's lawyers to ask the DHS where they got the supposed proof that no significant fraud occurred in 2020.

So... no proof
God you are stupid lol

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

People are assumed to be innocent until proven guilty.

Elections are assumed to be fair until proven unfair.

No other Republicans have complained about their being cheated out of votes.

Only Trump has complained. There is no proof that there was enough fraud to have resulted in Trump winning.

 

[Boris Norris]

How many voting machines images were illegally destroyed

I dont know. How many? You tell us Einstein.

Democrats cannot prove the election was clean in 2020 and the Trump-hating judge has blocked efforts by Trump's lawyers to ask the DHS where they got the supposed proof that no significant fraud occurred in 2020.

That's wrong and a lie.
Heard it all before. Dopey.

 

[mark francis]

People are assumed to be innocent until proven guilty.

Elections are assumed to be fair until proven unfair.

No other Republicans have complained about their being cheated out of votes.

Only Trump has complained. There is no proof that there was enough fraud to have resulted in Trump winning.

No, democrats did not assume Hillary's loss was fair, Stacey Abrams' loss was fair, or Gore's loss was fair.

 

[Boris Norris]

No, democrats did not assume Hillary's loss was fair, Stacey Abrams' loss was fair, or Gore's loss was fair.

That's correct and they never challenged it for 4 years trying to prove otherwise. You're still belching lies about it. Piss off with your rubbish.

 

[mark francis]

That's correct and they never challenged it for 4 years trying to prove otherwise. You're still belching lies about it. Piss off with your rubbish.

It may be hard to tell which contradictory statement of hers that Abrams insists is true.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/09/29/stacey-abramss-rhetorical-twist-being-an-election-denier/

Analysis by Glenn Kessler
September 29, 2022 at 3:00 a.m. EDT
“I have never denied that I lost. I don’t live in the governor’s mansion; I would have noticed.”
— Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams, interview on “The View,” Sept. 14, 2022

Cut through the 2024 election noise. Get The Campaign Moment newsletter.

“We had this little election back in 2018. And despite the final tally and the inauguration and the situation we find ourselves in, I do have one very affirmative statement to make. We won.”

— Abrams, speech at the National Action Network convention, April 4, 2019

 

[Boris Norris]

It may be hard to tell which contradictory statement of hers that Abrams insists is true.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/09/29/stacey-abramss-rhetorical-twist-being-an-election-denier/

Analysis by Glenn Kessler
September 29, 2022 at 3:00 a.m. EDT
“I have never denied that I lost. I don’t live in the governor’s mansion; I would have noticed.”
— Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams, interview on “The View,” Sept. 14, 2022

Cut through the 2024 election noise. Get The Campaign Moment newsletter.

“We had this little election back in 2018. And despite the final tally and the inauguration and the situation we find ourselves in, I do have one very affirmative statement to make. We won.”

— Abrams, speech at the National Action Network convention, April 4, 2019

There was no fraud.