Reply to thread

Like the interpretation of the Constitution, it is easy to have more than one interpretation of the words of a candidate.  Listening to the first part of the clip, my interpretation of her words is that she sees creationism as equally important to teaching the theory of evolution. 


Maybe that interpretation is wrong.


Maybe she really does think that the local school board should make the decision to substitute science with creationism, however absurd such a decision might be, but her previous statements about evolution being a "myth" and asking the astoundingly silly question, "why aren't monkeys still evolving into humans?" lead one to believe that she would like to see creationism substituted for science.


Back
Top