Democrat trick from Obama's early days: Get opponent's name removed from ballot

[mark francis]

Dirty Democrats will lie, steal, bribe, threaten, kill, and/or commit election fraud to get their chosen candidate elected. The latest trick of having Trump's name removed is a stunt that Democrats pulled nearly 30 years ago in the early days of Obama's rise to political prominence.

Democrats privately admit the inevitable after Colorado bars Trump from ballot: 'Attempting election interference' | Blaze Media (theblaze.com) 12-21-23

Democrats privately admit the inevitable after Colorado bars Trump from ballot: 'Attempting election interference'

Democrats are privately upset with the Colorado Supreme Court because they believe the ruling that bars Donald Trump from the Colorado ballot will ultimately help the former president.
++++++++++++++++++++++

Flashback: In 1996, Obama Challenged Signatures To Get All His Primary Opponents Thrown Off the Ballot (westernjournal.com) 11-23-20
Flashback: In 1996, Obama Challenged Signatures To Get All His Primary Opponents Thrown Off the Ballot

By Elizabeth Stauffer November 23, 2020 at 9:01am

At a time when Democrats and even more than a few Republicans are pressuring President Donald Trump to concede the election to former Vice President Joe Biden, it’s instructive to take a look at how former President Barack Obama won his seat in the Illinois state Senate in 1996.

A Chicago Tribune article published in April 2007 tells the unflattering truth. Tribune reporters David Jackson and Ray Long wrote that rather than winning the race “by leveling the playing field,” Obama won “by clearing it.” ...

On Jan. 2, 1996, according to Jackson and Long, “operatives for Barack Obama filed into a barren hearing room of the Chicago Board of Election Commissioners.”

“There they [Obama, his lawyer and his team] began the tedious process of challenging hundreds of signatures on the nominating petitions of state Sen. Alice Palmer … And they kept challenging petitions until every one of Obama’s four Democratic primary rivals was forced off the ballot,” the report said.

Nothing that Obama and his team did was illegal. One by one, they challenged each signature that his opponents had gathered as they were entitled to do.

 

[pjmret]

Dirty Democrats will lie, steal, bribe, threaten, kill, and/or commit election fraud to get their chosen candidate elected. The latest trick of having Trump's name removed is a stunt that Democrats pulled nearly 30 years ago in the early days of Obama's rise to political prominence.

Democrats privately admit the inevitable after Colorado bars Trump from ballot: 'Attempting election interference' | Blaze Media (theblaze.com) 12-21-23

Democrats privately admit the inevitable after Colorado bars Trump from ballot: 'Attempting election interference'

Democrats are privately upset with the Colorado Supreme Court because they believe the ruling that bars Donald Trump from the Colorado ballot will ultimately help the former president.
++++++++++++++++++++++

Flashback: In 1996, Obama Challenged Signatures To Get All His Primary Opponents Thrown Off the Ballot (westernjournal.com) 11-23-20
Flashback: In 1996, Obama Challenged Signatures To Get All His Primary Opponents Thrown Off the Ballot

By Elizabeth Stauffer November 23, 2020 at 9:01am

At a time when Democrats and even more than a few Republicans are pressuring President Donald Trump to concede the election to former Vice President Joe Biden, it’s instructive to take a look at how former President Barack Obama won his seat in the Illinois state Senate in 1996.

A Chicago Tribune article published in April 2007 tells the unflattering truth. Tribune reporters David Jackson and Ray Long wrote that rather than winning the race “by leveling the playing field,” Obama won “by clearing it.” ...

On Jan. 2, 1996, according to Jackson and Long, “operatives for Barack Obama filed into a barren hearing room of the Chicago Board of Election Commissioners.”

“There they [Obama, his lawyer and his team] began the tedious process of challenging hundreds of signatures on the nominating petitions of state Sen. Alice Palmer … And they kept challenging petitions until every one of Obama’s four Democratic primary rivals was forced off the ballot,” the report said.

Nothing that Obama and his team did was illegal. One by one, they challenged each signature that his opponents had gathered as they were entitled to do.

you are calling the 14th amendment a dirty trick? why do you hate the constitution?

maybe trump shoiuldn't have started an insurrection. you morons always blame others, never take responsibility

 

[mark francis]

you are calling the 14th amendment a dirty trick? why do you hate the constitution?

maybe trump shoiuldn't have started an insurrection. you morons always blame others, never take responsibility

Finding loopholes for removing names from ballots to clear the field of opponents may not be completely illegal, but it is certainly unethical and will guarantee a crook gets elected, not a good person.

 

[pjmret]

Finding loopholes for removing names from ballots to clear the field of opponents may not be completely illegal, but it is certainly unethical and will guarantee a crook gets elected, not a good person.

the constitution is a loophole now? lol.
the constitution is unethical now? lol

why do you hate the constitution?

 

[pjmret]

i find this thread amusing given how many republicans whined about obama not being eligible for president based on their usual stupidity about obama being born in kenya. lol.

i'm not sure its even intelligent enough to be called a "trick" hahahahahha

 

[mark francis]

i find this thread amusing given how many republicans whined about obama not being eligible for president based on their usual stupidity about obama being born in kenya. lol.

i'm not sure its even intelligent enough to be called a "trick" hahahahahha

Obama never allowed forensics experts to examine his belated "Certificate of Live Birth" which had so many troubling details that inspired doubt as to its authenticity.

 

[pjmret]

Obama never allowed forensics experts to examine his belated "Certificate of Live Birth" which had so many troubling details that inspired doubt as to its authenticity.

Not his responsibility to pander to you morons lol. Hawaii officials said it was legitimate *****

The Hawaiian state health official who personally reviewed Barack Obama's original birth record has affirmed again that the document is "real" and denounced "conspiracy theorists" in the so-called "birther" movement.

You morons are so amusing lol

Explain his birth announcement in the local paper in Hawaii if he was born in Kenya. Lol

 

[mark francis]

Not his responsibility to pander to you morons lol. Hawaii officials said it was legitimate *****

The Hawaiian state health official who personally reviewed Barack Obama's original birth record has affirmed again that the document is "real" and denounced "conspiracy theorists" in the so-called "birther" movement.

You morons are so amusing lol

Explain his birth announcement in the local paper in Hawaii if he was born in Kenya. Lol

The Democrat bootlicks who produced an apparently forged Obama birth certificate 2 years after they began looking for the real b.c. certified the 'copy' as genuine. There are suspicious circumstances surrounding the reported Hawaiian announcement as well as many other suspicious aspects of the certificate. The fact that Obama refuses to allow forensics to examine the b.c. is evidence of an attempt to hide details and evidence.

 

[pjmret]

The Democrat bootlicks who produced an apparently forged Obama birth certificate 2 years after they began looking for the real b.c. certified the 'copy' as genuine. There are suspicious circumstances surrounding the reported Hawaiian announcement as well as many other suspicious aspects of the certificate. The fact that Obama refuses to allow forensics to examine the b.c. is evidence of an attempt to hide details and evidence.


Explain the birth announcement ***** lol

 

[mark francis]

The strange way in which the announcements were inserted into more than one paper suggests something was not right. The names of some people in the report were found to be unverifiable. The exact order in which the names were listed is suspicious. The address listed as Obama's parent's house could not be verified. There is no name of the hospital in which he was born and his purported 'Certificate of live Birth' lists the name of a hospital that did not exist at the time of his birth. But there is a lot more. Here is a video listing many of the suspicious aspects of the suspicious birth certificate:

was obama's birth certificate examined forensically and found to be genuine - Suchen Videos

www.bing.com

 

[pjmret]

The strange way in which the announcements were inserted into more than one paper suggests something was not right. The names of some people in the report were found to be unverifiable. The exact order in which the names were listed is suspicious. The address listed as Obama's parent's house could not be verified. There is no name of the hospital in which he was born and his purported 'Certificate of live Birth' lists the name of a hospital that did not exist at the time of his birth. But there is a lot more. Here is a video listing many of the suspicious aspects of the suspicious birth certificate:

was obama's birth certificate examined forensically and found to be genuine - Suchen Videos

www.bing.com

Lol baby born in Kenya has birth announcement placed in Hawaii to set stage for future president run decades later ?
Lololololololololol

 

[mark francis]

Lol baby born in Kenya has birth announcement placed in Hawaii to set stage for future president run decades later ?
Lololololololololol

Perhaps the vague reference to Obama's birth was inserted into the record later or perhaps it does reference a birth that took place, naming no hospital and an address the neighbors at the time could not verify was genuine. Obama's grandparents could have placed the vague notice in the paper at the time in order to provide future citizenship benefits for their grandson they knew was born elsewhere. If the Democrats would only allow independent experts to examine the certificate all of the suspicions and questions might possibly be cleared up.

 

[pjmret]

Perhaps the vague reference to Obama's birth was inserted into the record later or perhaps it does reference a birth that took place, naming no hospital and an address the neighbors at the time could not verify was genuine. Obama's grandparents could have placed the vague notice in the paper at the time in order to provide future citizenship benefits for their grandson they knew was born elsewhere. If the Democrats would only allow independent experts to examine the certificate all of the suspicions and questions might possibly be cleared up.

Perhaps? Lol
You can't 8nsert announcements into physical papers later *****
God you are stupid lol

 

[mark francis]

Perhaps? Lol
You can't 8nsert announcements into physical papers later *****
God you are stupid lol

Let's suppose the announcements were genuine, in spite of the fact they seem to have been inserted by someone not familiar with the surroundings, explaining why the address was wrong and no hospital was named.

Do Obama's birth announcements prove he was born in Hawaii? (Honolulu Advertiser newspaper) | 24Ahead 9-15-09



Do Obama's birth announcements prove he was born in Hawaii? (Honolulu Advertiser newspaper)

Posted Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 4:18 pm · short link

Shortly after Barack Obama was born, two identical announcements appeared in Hawaiian newspapers announcing his birth. The announcements do not prove he was born there, for the reasons outlined below.

(Unfortunately, since many witting or unwitting fans of Obama and the mainstream media are hard of thinking, I'll have to put this in bold up front: that doesn't mean he wasn't born there; that just means that the announcements aren't proof).

The announcements are simply evidence; they aren't conclusive proof and as evidence they aren't as strong as Obama supporters and the MSM would have you believe. Obama's supporters - witting or unwitting - are as usual intellectually dishonest and engaging in sloppy thinking or they're attempting to mislead people.

* What the announcements say

This is all both say:

Mr. and Mrs. Barack H. Obama, 6085 Kalanianaole Hwy., son, Aug. 4

The address given is supposedly that of his parents. Per WorldNetDaily, an investigator's team were unable to locate anyone who remembered them living there [1].

In both papers, the other names listed are the same and in the same order. This site checked some of the other names against the Social Security file and found some that didn't match; that may have an innocent explanation such as people moving and not updating their files at the time and so on.

* What the announcements don't say
* The city where Obama was born...
* the hospital where he was born...
* they don't even have his name.

If the announcements said he was born in Hawaii, and it could be shown that only a birth hospital could have placed the announcements, that would certainly be nearly conclusive evidence. However, the proof that Obama supporters are using doesn't even say where he was born.

* Was there motivation to "plant" the announcements?
The canard section below discusses those who've tried to pretend that the only reason someone could have "planted" the announcements was in case Obama would run for president. Yet, there are other reasons: assuming for the minute that Obama was born overseas, the grandparents might have wanted the announcements as keepsakes, or to prove that Obama was born in the U.S. in case of a custody battle, or to prove that he was born in the U.S. because U.S. citizenship is very valuable.

 

[pjmret]

Let's suppose the announcements were genuine, in spite of the fact they seem to have been inserted by someone not familiar with the surroundings, explaining why the address was wrong and no hospital was named.

Do Obama's birth announcements prove he was born in Hawaii? (Honolulu Advertiser newspaper) | 24Ahead 9-15-09



Do Obama's birth announcements prove he was born in Hawaii? (Honolulu Advertiser newspaper)

Posted Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 4:18 pm · short link

Shortly after Barack Obama was born, two identical announcements appeared in Hawaiian newspapers announcing his birth. The announcements do not prove he was born there, for the reasons outlined below.

(Unfortunately, since many witting or unwitting fans of Obama and the mainstream media are hard of thinking, I'll have to put this in bold up front: that doesn't mean he wasn't born there; that just means that the announcements aren't proof).

The announcements are simply evidence; they aren't conclusive proof and as evidence they aren't as strong as Obama supporters and the MSM would have you believe. Obama's supporters - witting or unwitting - are as usual intellectually dishonest and engaging in sloppy thinking or they're attempting to mislead people.

* What the announcements say

This is all both say:

Mr. and Mrs. Barack H. Obama, 6085 Kalanianaole Hwy., son, Aug. 4

The address given is supposedly that of his parents. Per WorldNetDaily, an investigator's team were unable to locate anyone who remembered them living there [1].

In both papers, the other names listed are the same and in the same order. This site checked some of the other names against the Social Security file and found some that didn't match; that may have an innocent explanation such as people moving and not updating their files at the time and so on.

* What the announcements don't say
* The city where Obama was born...
* the hospital where he was born...
* they don't even have his name.

If the announcements said he was born in Hawaii, and it could be shown that only a birth hospital could have placed the announcements, that would certainly be nearly conclusive evidence. However, the proof that Obama supporters are using doesn't even say where he was born.

* Was there motivation to "plant" the announcements?
The canard section below discusses those who've tried to pretend that the only reason someone could have "planted" the announcements was in case Obama would run for president. Yet, there are other reasons: assuming for the minute that Obama was born overseas, the grandparents might have wanted the announcements as keepsakes, or to prove that Obama was born in the U.S. in case of a custody battle, or to prove that he was born in the U.S. because U.S. citizenship is very valuable.

So you morons have nothing lol

Everything bis fake because you morons say so lol

Let me know when you mor9ns have credible proof of... anything