Darwin got a lot wrong also

[the annoying thing]

What Darwin Got Right (and Wrong) About Evolution | Britannica

Darwin got most of the high-level stuff right, but he messed up on a few important details.

www.britannica.com

Darwin's Great Blunder—and Why It Was Good for the World

The best thing we can do for the theory of evolution may be to bring its creator back down to earth.

www.discovermagazine.com

Even the best of the best gets things wrong. The same can be said about Einstein.

5 times Einstein was wrong | Astronomy.com

Physicists are constantly trying - and failing - to prove Albert Einstein wrong. We take a look at some of his biggest blunders.

www.astronomy.com

Kinda makes you wonder about some things when your not sure.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

The way the scientific method works is that scientists propose a possible explanation and them try to disprove it.
Darwin was one of the first to recognize how natural selection works. He never claimed that anyone was descended from monkeys.
The reality is that apes (apes have no tails, while monkeys do) and humans have a common ancestor.

Evolution has gone far beyond Darwin.

 

[the annoying thing]

The way the scientific method works is that scientists propose a possible explanation and them try to disprove it.
Darwin was one of the first to recognize how natural selection works. He never claimed that anyone was descended from monkeys.
The reality is that apes (apes have no tails, while monkeys do) and humans have a common ancestor.

Evolution has gone far beyond Darwin.

I know that I was just showing that science often gets it wrong . Science is also evolving as were serious just in our infancy of comprehension

 

[the annoying thing]

The way the scientific method works is that scientists propose a possible explanation and them try to disprove it.
Darwin was one of the first to recognize how natural selection works. He never claimed that anyone was descended from monkeys.
The reality is that apes (apes have no tails, while monkeys do) and humans have a common ancestor.

Evolution has gone far beyond Darwin. I am very well acquainted with how science works and that that are often wrong as new theory's come and go.

 

[Tripoli]

What Darwin Got Right (and Wrong) About Evolution | Britannica

Darwin got most of the high-level stuff right, but he messed up on a few important details.

www.britannica.com

Darwin's Great Blunder—and Why It Was Good for the World

The best thing we can do for the theory of evolution may be to bring its creator back down to earth.

www.discovermagazine.com

Even the best of the best gets things wrong. The same can be said about Einstein.

5 times Einstein was wrong | Astronomy.com

Physicists are constantly trying - and failing - to prove Albert Einstein wrong. We take a look at some of his biggest blunders.

www.astronomy.com

Kinda makes you wonder about some things when your not sure.

LOL, real scientist never even mention Darwin anymore

 

[mark francis]

The way the scientific method works is that scientists propose a possible explanation and them try to disprove it.
Darwin was one of the first to recognize how natural selection works. He never claimed that anyone was descended from monkeys.
The reality is that apes (apes have no tails, while monkeys do) and humans have a common ancestor.

Evolution has gone far beyond Darwin.

Evolution has never been proven beyond doubt and God's creation of all things has never been disproven beyond doubt.

 

[pjmret]

Evolution has never been proven beyond doubt and God's creation of all things has never been disproven beyond doubt.

Think8ng the Bible is a science text is stupid

 

[mark francis]

Think8ng the Bible is a science text is stupid

The Bible is a book of life filled with instructions for successful living and should not be considered a mere textbook on high school subject matters.

 

[pjmret]

The Bible is a book of life filled with instructions for successful living and should not be considered a mere textbook on high school subject matters.

It shouldn't be considered a science text at all
But it is by science *****

 

[mark francis]

It shouldn't be considered a science text at all

Exactly. The Bible is a book of instructions from God, not a math or biology primer.

 

[pjmret]

Exactly. The Bible is a book of instructions from God, not a math or biology primer.

But you said the Bible was 100 percent accurate scientifically
Now you say it isn't lol

 

[mark francis]

But you said the Bible was 100 percent accurate scientifically
Now you say it isn't lol

Nothing in the Bible has ever been scientifically disproven, but the Bible is not a school textbook on science - it is far more than that.

 

[pjmret]

Nothing in the Bible has ever been scientifically disproven, but the Bible is not a school textbook on science - it is far more than that.

the question isn't whether it is "far more" than that.
duh.

the question is whether the bible is scientifically accurate.
you claim it is, apaprently.
you actually think the earth is 6000 years old?
hahahahaha
hahahahahhaha\
hahahahahah

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

Nothing in the Bible has ever been scientifically disproven, but the Bible is not a school textbook on science - it is far more than that.

It is FAR, FAR LESS. It does not even give us the date of Jesus birth. It fails to name the Pharaoh during Moses time by name. It contradicts itself over and over. Just google 'Biblical contradictions'.

 

[mark francis]

the question isn't whether it is "far more" than that.
duh.

the question is whether the bible is scientifically accurate.
you claim it is, apaprently.
you actually think the earth is 6000 years old?
hahahahaha
hahahahahhaha\
hahahahahah

Wannabe scientists refuse to consider evidence of a young earth, proving they are not real scientists because of their bias against evidence they do not want to see.