Yes, but really it should be the DNC/Clinton fued instead. Obama is just an insert.
Consider the Florida/Michigan caper..
The DNC knew full-well what the consequences of denying those votes from those two states meant...and they knew of other avenues to sanction them besides handing the advantage to Obama. They could've, for instance, sanctioned FLA and Mich in the next presidential campaign to have their primaries dead last.
No, they knew what they were doing.
And now it's plain for all to see.
The DNC passed over Hillary specifically, deliberatly and with cause. Though what the cause exactly is remains open to some speculation.
Many people have speculated that the DNC is infested with GOPs-in-sheep's-clothing. Meanwhile, the preponderance of catholic pro-life DNC bigwigs doesn't bat an eyelash in other circles..
If this pans out to be the case, it makes perfect sense why they would stonewall Clinton. In fact, knowing beforehand, certain people may have encouraged Florida and Michigan to go out of turn, thus justifying sanctioning those two big states that everyone knew in-advance would be pro-Hillary...
Hmmmm...
I wonder if we were to interview the people responsible for setting primary dates in those two states, what would we find?
Why did they make the decision to vote out of turn, knowing there would be problems? They had to know that, eh? If I was an oversight person in either of those two states, I would be conducting an investigation as to why my public officials squandered, purposefully or otherwise, the very crucial votes of my state.
Why does it make perfect sense if DNC is infested with GOP agendas? Nominating Obama meant a sure win for the GOP. Clinton meant a sure loss.
My bet is that they had this one in the bag back in 2006. And if you really wanted to go back in time, it is remotely possible you would find a GOP headhunt for just the profile that Obama fits nicely...
But then you know me, I'm a whacked out conspiracy theorist...
