Reply to thread

"Just as I thought.... You do consider any form of AGW scrutiny to be done out of stupidity and/or an anti-science position. That's a shame since it was you who claimed there could be intelligent debate on the topic but all you have to offer are more fallacious arguments delivered with utter contempt for anyone who would disagree. "


Even scientists within the field of climate change very frequently question their own data as well as their own results and the data and results of others.  It happens every day.  There is a process for doing that.  It's called peer review.


Back
Top