First, not all Israelis are orthodox Jews.
Second, you can't logically argue from a position you don't completely believe in. Why? Because you do not completely believe the entire thing, then how do you think you know what all the religion teaches? You do not.
That's why when the correct defining of OT laws are written here, instead of admitting what they are saying, you simply claim "so convenience renders the Supreme Ten as subordinate to man's wishes".
No, they are not subordinate to man's wishes, those are the actual meanings of the laws.
Basically, you have twisted some to mean what you wish, and then when we revert to the actual meaning of the words, you claim we're changing things. That's because you didn't know what they meant to begin with.
Just like you don't understand the Sabbath. The Sabbath was made for man, not man made for the Sabbath. If your son fell down a well, would you say your violating the Sabbath by "working" to get him out? Of course not. That's plain stupid. If someone broke into your home and threatened your family, would you say you violated the Sabbath by defending your home and family? Of course not. Thats idiocy.
So when Hamas shoots mortars into Israel, killing people and blowing things up, what right do you have, who isn't even a believer, to claim you know they are violating the Sabbath by responding? Zero.
