Libsmasher
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2008
- Messages
- 3,151
- Theres's the AGW lunacy that will cost millions of people their jobs, and drastically lower the lifestyle of people in the US if it gets traction, and it looks like it probably will.
- There are the land takings from farmers etc, unfortunate enough to have an endangered rat burrow or something on their land.
- There's $4/gallon gasoline while alaska oil goes untapped so as not to ruin the scenic view of a few moose herds.
- There's the nuclear power paranoia that probably makes your electric bill twice what it should be, and worse in the future.
- And then there's the ef opposition to GM food:
GM food can:
- increase food productivity
- reduce the need for pesticides
- improve plants' ability to survive drought
- improve nutrients in them
On and on.
But efs oppose them, even though they would be good for the environment.
From the Huffington Post (where else? ): “There have been few experiments as reckless, overhyped and with as little potential upside as the rapid rollout of genetically modified crops.”
- There are the land takings from farmers etc, unfortunate enough to have an endangered rat burrow or something on their land.
- There's $4/gallon gasoline while alaska oil goes untapped so as not to ruin the scenic view of a few moose herds.
- There's the nuclear power paranoia that probably makes your electric bill twice what it should be, and worse in the future.
- And then there's the ef opposition to GM food:
GM food can:
- increase food productivity
- reduce the need for pesticides
- improve plants' ability to survive drought
- improve nutrients in them
On and on.
But efs oppose them, even though they would be good for the environment.
From the Huffington Post (where else? ): “There have been few experiments as reckless, overhyped and with as little potential upside as the rapid rollout of genetically modified crops.”